The following is a Macsmind Public Service clarification for thechronically uniformed and ignorant, eg:

“Since April 2, Malveaux has wrongly and repeatedly claimed that Pelosi had no “standing” and was not acting in an “official capacity,” has attacked the trip as “political theater” and a “political stunt,” and has parroted the Bush administration’s attacks on Pelosi for going to Syria while ignoring the fact that a Republican-led delegation met with Assad on April 1. Most recently, Malveaux asked whether Pelosi’s trip was a “big wet kiss to President Al-Assad.”

CNN (hate to admit) is right. You know it’s got to be bad when fellow liberals trash Jihad Nancy’s Terrorist Tour. Now for the clarifications:

1. Pelosi has no standing (constitutional or otherwise) to deliver foreign policy packages or even to enter negotiations - much less kowtowing in a scarf to America’s enemies.

2. It’s IS political theater - That’s all Democrats know is theater. Which makes then all the much more dangerous.

3. See number 2 - ditto.

As for Malveaux’s “big wet kiss” observation, see number one about the scarf, with that submissive move, theonly thing she didn’t do is “turn out the lights” and light up a cigarette afterwards.

(Oh that’s right, she doesn’t smoke!)