Comments on: Uncovering the Rogue CIA

By: Marilyn

Marilyn — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 21:37:16 +0000

Five will get you ten that the imbedded Clintonistas and the media will managed to either bury or “discredit” both these expose’ books. They have the power because they control what comes out of the agency. If they don’t like it, it gets sidetracked to the trash. Until someone discovers how to clean house, like Clinton and Algore did, and replace the traitors with people loyal to the current administration, I don’t see anyone being able to control what these people do. The whole shebang in the State Dept. and our intelligence agencies should serve at the pleasure of the President. But that would take a rewrite of the Civil Service laws and since civil servants are the only Union members, since Clinton arranged to transfer our unionized manufacturing base to his beloved Chairman Mao’s China, I don’t think either party dares stand up to them. Too bad Bush can’t hire his own loyalists to interfere in the next Democrat’s foreign policy. But if he did, Everyone would be yelling about his adding to the federal payroll. He can’t win no matter what he does.

By: Cornhusker

Cornhusker — Tue, 24 Jul 2007 23:00:50 +0000

Mac,

Also heard today, via Fox News, that Comey tried to scrap a vital intel program right under Ashcroft’s nose when he was in the hospital. Think Comey was under orders from Chuckie?

The Judiciary committee called Gonzales a LIAR AGAIN today!!! When is this sh*t gonna stop? Sigh.

By: clarice

clarice — Tue, 24 Jul 2007 22:16:06 +0000

“They had better keep the responses rolling because according to a tip there is another book coming out that specifically exposes how Wilson/Plame conspired with media and Government officials to attemp to throw the ‚Äúdogs off‚Äù of Iraq in the lead up to the war.”

Whisper in my ear, pls.

By: habanero

habanero — Tue, 24 Jul 2007 19:33:49 +0000

The ’92 election was basicly a coup, the CIA had their fingers all over that.

Part of the reason for Reno’s firing the US Attorney’s in ’93 was to cover up corruption involving the CIA, namely the dope running operation into Mena, Ark. That dope running operation didn’t end with the ending of Iran-Contra.

By: Mark

Mark — Tue, 24 Jul 2007 16:37:42 +0000

Wow, this is some pretty damning stuff. Maybe a Sunday talk show host can bring Scarborough on to debate some former CIA people like Pillar, Scheuer, and/or Yaphe. It would make for an interesting show if the host could handle it the right way.

Mac, I think Scarborough is with the Examiner now. Not the Washington Times any more.

By: Bobby

Bobby — Tue, 24 Jul 2007 16:00:10 +0000

After six years, we’ve not repaired the devastation wrought by the Clinton Admin., whose greatest accomplishment was to teach the entrenched Left to manage the “news cycle.” Outrages become so numerous and routine as to merit but fleeting attention. Repeated enough, the most flagrant is ignored as “nothing new” or important:

Merriam Webster’s Collegiate Dictionary–
Fifth Column: a group of secret sympathizers or supporters of an enemy that engage in espionage or sabotage within defense lines or national borders.