Comments on: The Ugly Side of Revisionism http://macsmind.com/wordpress/news/the-ugly-side-of-revisionism/ Official Blog of the MacRanger Radio Show on Blog Talk Radio Tue, 07 Feb 2012 14:48:20 -0600 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.3 By: habanero http://macsmind.com/wordpress/news/the-ugly-side-of-revisionism/comment-page-1/#comment-3367 habanero Wed, 26 Sep 2007 22:15:05 +0000 http://www.macsmind.com/wordpress/2007/09/25/the-ugly-side-of-revisionism/#comment-3367 Congradulations, you just proved my point. BOR and JW have both said basicly that was the point of their conversation, but because a small part of their conversation was taken out of context, the mental midgets of the left had jumped to the wrong conclusion. Congradulations, you just proved my point.

BOR and JW have both said basicly that was the point of their conversation, but because a small part of their conversation was taken out of context, the mental midgets of the left had jumped to the wrong conclusion.

]]> By: jay k. http://macsmind.com/wordpress/news/the-ugly-side-of-revisionism/comment-page-1/#comment-3366 jay k. Wed, 26 Sep 2007 20:09:40 +0000 http://www.macsmind.com/wordpress/2007/09/25/the-ugly-side-of-revisionism/#comment-3366 yes there was more. what is your point? it does not change the context, or the meaning. oreally, a top level water carrier for the white house and the republicans, is "couldn't get over the fact" that blacks are not different from the italians in the suburbs. until you can explain how that is out of context, we will just assume it is in context. what oreally does is probably too subtle and complicated for someone like you to understand so let me help you. he portrays all black people as either disciples of al sharpton or jesse jackson, or straight-up rap gangsters. then he seems shocked that not everyone fits his skewed stereotype. to people like you he can sell that as a compliment because you are unable to reason it through. the reality is that the differences between the customers at syvias and oreallys imaginary italian restaurant have not been any different for a long time. but rascists cannot see that. it's like you and your two types of supporters for the left. it's total bs...but you believe it. yes there was more. what is your point? it does not change the context, or the meaning. oreally, a top level water carrier for the white house and the republicans, is “couldn’t get over the fact” that blacks are not different from the italians in the suburbs. until you can explain how that is out of context, we will just assume it is in context.
what oreally does is probably too subtle and complicated for someone like you to understand so let me help you. he portrays all black people as either disciples of al sharpton or jesse jackson, or straight-up rap gangsters. then he seems shocked that not everyone fits his skewed stereotype. to people like you he can sell that as a compliment because you are unable to reason it through. the reality is that the differences between the customers at syvias and oreallys imaginary italian restaurant have not been any different for a long time. but rascists cannot see that. it’s like you and your two types of supporters for the left. it’s total bs…but you believe it.

]]> By: habanero http://macsmind.com/wordpress/news/the-ugly-side-of-revisionism/comment-page-1/#comment-3365 habanero Wed, 26 Sep 2007 19:26:20 +0000 http://www.macsmind.com/wordpress/2007/09/25/the-ugly-side-of-revisionism/#comment-3365 Ok I will try and get a little slower for you. You have taken a small part of an overall conversation and reached a conclusion about the conversation from this small part. That's called taking something out of context. You're not ignorant of the fact there was more to the conversation than what you posted here are you? Ok I will try and get a little slower for you.

You have taken a small part of an overall conversation and reached a conclusion about the conversation from this small part. That’s called taking something out of context.

You’re not ignorant of the fact there was more to the conversation than what you posted here are you?

]]> By: jay k. http://macsmind.com/wordpress/news/the-ugly-side-of-revisionism/comment-page-1/#comment-3349 jay k. Wed, 26 Sep 2007 19:00:52 +0000 http://www.macsmind.com/wordpress/2007/09/25/the-ugly-side-of-revisionism/#comment-3349 again - slower - what was taken out of context? williams is a paid foil to o'really on fox. hardly an un-biased observer. please explain what is out of context. this is probably too complex for you to understand but when people are on the radio or television then listeners and viewers are part (albeit passive) of the conversation. perhaps you are unable to judge context for yourself without the folks at faux news telling you what it is. at this point based on what you have said i wouldn't be suprised. but then again maybe you'll suprise me...so again...please explain what is out of context. again – slower – what was taken out of context? williams is a paid foil to o’really on fox. hardly an un-biased observer. please explain what is out of context. this is probably too complex for you to understand but when people are on the radio or television then listeners and viewers are part (albeit passive) of the conversation. perhaps you are unable to judge context for yourself without the folks at faux news telling you what it is. at this point based on what you have said i wouldn’t be suprised. but then again maybe you’ll suprise me…so again…please explain what is out of context.

]]> By: habanero http://macsmind.com/wordpress/news/the-ugly-side-of-revisionism/comment-page-1/#comment-3350 habanero Wed, 26 Sep 2007 18:39:06 +0000 http://www.macsmind.com/wordpress/2007/09/25/the-ugly-side-of-revisionism/#comment-3350 jay k. ass Juan Williams is the one that was having the conversation with BOL. JW is the one that has confirmed the statement is taken out of context. Maybe this is too complicated for you to understand, but the people having a conversation are the ones to determine the context of the statements in the conversation, not people outside of the conversation. For example, if someone were to listen to a conversation between two people that work in the oilfields, they might think they were listening to a conversation between dope dealers because they would be using words like dope, joints, tripping. Get the picture? Name me a group besides the ignorant or stupid that supports the positions of the left. Can't do that. Then give me one position of the left that's not based on lies. jay k. ass

Juan Williams is the one that was having the conversation with BOL. JW is the one that has confirmed the statement is taken out of context.

Maybe this is too complicated for you to understand, but the people having a conversation are the ones to determine the context of the statements in the conversation, not people outside of the conversation.

For example, if someone were to listen to a conversation between two people that work in the oilfields, they might think they were listening to a conversation between dope dealers because they would be using words like dope, joints, tripping. Get the picture?

Name me a group besides the ignorant or stupid that supports the positions of the left. Can’t do that. Then give me one position of the left that’s not based on lies.

]]> By: jay k. http://macsmind.com/wordpress/news/the-ugly-side-of-revisionism/comment-page-1/#comment-3351 jay k. Wed, 26 Sep 2007 18:00:25 +0000 http://www.macsmind.com/wordpress/2007/09/25/the-ugly-side-of-revisionism/#comment-3351 also, "...there are two groups of people that support the left..." you are a regular genius aren't you? is this what passes for thinking for you? it is gross generalizations like this lie at the heart of racism. also,
“…there are two groups of people that support the left…” you are a regular genius aren’t you? is this what passes for thinking for you? it is gross generalizations like this lie at the heart of racism.

]]> By: jay k. http://macsmind.com/wordpress/news/the-ugly-side-of-revisionism/comment-page-1/#comment-3352 jay k. Wed, 26 Sep 2007 17:11:23 +0000 http://www.macsmind.com/wordpress/2007/09/25/the-ugly-side-of-revisionism/#comment-3352 habanero... you swallowed o'reallys story hook line and sinker didn't you? i'm sure you do the same with all the rnc talking points. have you ever had an independent thought? please, i beg you...tell me exactly what is out of context. habanero…
you swallowed o’reallys story hook line and sinker didn’t you? i’m sure you do the same with all the rnc talking points. have you ever had an independent thought? please, i beg you…tell me exactly what is out of context.

]]> By: habanero http://macsmind.com/wordpress/news/the-ugly-side-of-revisionism/comment-page-1/#comment-3353 habanero Wed, 26 Sep 2007 16:05:42 +0000 http://www.macsmind.com/wordpress/2007/09/25/the-ugly-side-of-revisionism/#comment-3353 jay k. ass The fact of the matter is that I, like anyone else half a step ahead of an idiot, recognised immediately that your statement from BOL was taken out of context. This was confirmed by Juan Williams on BOL last night. So once again it is confirmed that lefties, such as yourself, have to lie to try and make a point. There are two groups of people that support the left: Those that are too ignorant to know they are being lied to, and those that know they are being lied to and are just too stupid to care. Simple question: When you posted the statement from BOL were you too ignorant to know it was taken out of context? jay k. ass

The fact of the matter is that I, like anyone else half a step ahead of an idiot, recognised immediately that your statement from BOL was taken out of context. This was confirmed by Juan Williams on BOL last night. So once again it is confirmed that lefties, such as yourself, have to lie to try and make a point.

There are two groups of people that support the left:

Those that are too ignorant to know they are being lied to, and those that know they are being lied to and are just too stupid to care.

Simple question:
When you posted the statement from BOL were you too ignorant to know it was taken out of context?

]]> By: jay k. http://macsmind.com/wordpress/news/the-ugly-side-of-revisionism/comment-page-1/#comment-3354 jay k. Wed, 26 Sep 2007 15:14:55 +0000 http://www.macsmind.com/wordpress/2007/09/25/the-ugly-side-of-revisionism/#comment-3354 habanero... you don't seem to understand what it is that o'really said. what he said is that he "couldn't get over the fact that" blacks aren't different from other people. in general i don't support racists, although no one is perfect. i did not and will not vote for a clinton. you seem, based on the evidence, easily confused by complex sentences, prone to misjudgment, and jump easily to conclusions not based on facts or evidence. habanero…
you don’t seem to understand what it is that o’really said. what he said is that he “couldn’t get over the fact that” blacks aren’t different from other people. in general i don’t support racists, although no one is perfect. i did not and will not vote for a clinton. you seem, based on the evidence, easily confused by complex sentences, prone to misjudgment, and jump easily to conclusions not based on facts or evidence.

]]> By: habanero http://macsmind.com/wordpress/news/the-ugly-side-of-revisionism/comment-page-1/#comment-3355 habanero Wed, 26 Sep 2007 14:10:58 +0000 http://www.macsmind.com/wordpress/2007/09/25/the-ugly-side-of-revisionism/#comment-3355 So jay k. ass, I guess it's safe to asume by your comment that you believe blacks are different from other people. Is that why you support racist like the Clinton's? So jay k. ass, I guess it’s safe to asume by your comment that you believe blacks are different from other people.

Is that why you support racist like the Clinton’s?

]]>