Comments on: The scenes the Clintonistas didn’t want America to see http://macsmind.com/wordpress/news/the-scenes-the-clintonistas-didnt-want-america-to-see/ Official Blog of the MacRanger Radio Show on Blog Talk Radio Tue, 07 Feb 2012 14:48:20 -0600 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.3 By: shield http://macsmind.com/wordpress/news/the-scenes-the-clintonistas-didnt-want-america-to-see/comment-page-1/#comment-426 shield Sun, 10 Sep 2006 17:49:15 +0000 http://www.macsmind.com/wordpress/2006/09/10/the-scenes-the-clintonistas-didnt-want-america-to-see/#comment-426 There's an Aussie that's seen first part of The Path to 911. Tells all to watch it... http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1698800/posts There’s an Aussie that’s seen first part of The Path to 911. Tells all to watch it…
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1698800/posts

]]> By: shield http://macsmind.com/wordpress/news/the-scenes-the-clintonistas-didnt-want-america-to-see/comment-page-1/#comment-425 shield Sun, 10 Sep 2006 17:39:01 +0000 http://www.macsmind.com/wordpress/2006/09/10/the-scenes-the-clintonistas-didnt-want-america-to-see/#comment-425 This site is presently down but always have great video's http://www.traditonalvalues.org /clinton_abc.html Original trailer for The Path to 911 at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v v =aHgbeJu1WGk ABC showing different trailers. This site is presently down but
always have great video’s
http://www.traditonalvalues.org
/clinton_abc.html

Original trailer for The Path to
911 at
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v v =aHgbeJu1WGk

ABC showing different trailers.

]]> By: bobsunshine http://macsmind.com/wordpress/news/the-scenes-the-clintonistas-didnt-want-america-to-see/comment-page-1/#comment-424 bobsunshine Sun, 10 Sep 2006 17:06:21 +0000 http://www.macsmind.com/wordpress/2006/09/10/the-scenes-the-clintonistas-didnt-want-america-to-see/#comment-424 Here is what was on Michelle‚Äôs web site about the ‚Äúcutting‚Äù of the movie: From a reader: ‚ÄúNow ABC's web site shows tonight's episode as only 2.5 hours, followed by a special 30 minute Nightline (no doubt with many Democratic guests.) Likewise, tomorrow's episode is only 90 minutes, having been edited for President Bush's speech.‚Äù The fact is tonight‚Äôs part is about the years 1993 to 2000, and it was always three hours with 30 minutes at the end for a comment and answer session. So I don‚Äôt think large blocks were cut out. Second, the second night was to be from 2000 to 9-11, which are the Bush‚Äôs years. It also was to be for 3 hours, with half for the movie and half for the comment and interview section. My feeling is that they reduced the interview section versus the movie for the President‚Äôs speech. Now for the headline: In Australia, the first night has already been shown on TV and according to reviews, there isn't much cut that you can see (based on the comments). I don‚Äôt think they would show one version overseas and another on US TV. See this thread from FreeRepublic: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1698800/posts Here is what was on Michelle‚Äôs web site about the ‚Äúcutting‚Äù of the movie: From a reader: ‚ÄúNow ABC’s web site shows tonight’s episode as only 2.5 hours, followed by a special 30 minute Nightline (no doubt with many Democratic guests.) Likewise, tomorrow’s episode is only 90 minutes, having been edited for President Bush’s speech.‚Äù

The fact is tonight’s part is about the years 1993 to 2000, and it was always three hours with 30 minutes at the end for a comment and answer session. So I don’t think large blocks were cut out. Second, the second night was to be from 2000 to 9-11, which are the Bush’s years. It also was to be for 3 hours, with half for the movie and half for the comment and interview section. My feeling is that they reduced the interview section versus the movie for the President’s speech.
Now for the headline: In Australia, the first night has already been shown on TV and according to reviews, there isn’t much cut that you can see (based on the comments). I don‚Äôt think they would show one version overseas and another on US TV.

See this thread from FreeRepublic:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1698800/posts

]]> By: DaleinAtlanta http://macsmind.com/wordpress/news/the-scenes-the-clintonistas-didnt-want-america-to-see/comment-page-1/#comment-423 DaleinAtlanta Sun, 10 Sep 2006 16:40:01 +0000 http://www.macsmind.com/wordpress/2006/09/10/the-scenes-the-clintonistas-didnt-want-america-to-see/#comment-423 Sorry, Alia Ghanem was Bin Laden's mother, her neice, Najwa Ghanem was Bin Laden's first wife! Sorry, Alia Ghanem was Bin Laden’s mother, her neice, Najwa Ghanem was Bin Laden’s first wife!

]]> By: DaleinAtlanta http://macsmind.com/wordpress/news/the-scenes-the-clintonistas-didnt-want-america-to-see/comment-page-1/#comment-422 DaleinAtlanta Sun, 10 Sep 2006 16:29:40 +0000 http://www.macsmind.com/wordpress/2006/09/10/the-scenes-the-clintonistas-didnt-want-america-to-see/#comment-422 Mac: Look at this: http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060910/ap_on_re_us/airport_arrest Very little happens by mistake, or coincidence with the Jihadis! "Ghamen" is a family name will known to Bin Laden; it's his mother's Maiden name; and also the Maiden name of his First wife, since he married his First cousin, named Alia Ghanem, when he was 17 years old. Granted, his mother's family was supposedly from Syria, and bin Laden is supposedly a "Saudi", and this guy, is supposedly a "Yemeni"; but we know that Bin Laden is really of Yemeni/Hadramuti Blood, and I wouldn't at all be surprised, if his mother's and first wife's family, though "Syrian", originated either in Yemen, or in the Asir Province of Saudi, right north of Yemen, and for all intents and purposes, is a Yemeni "colony" within Saudi Arabia! Just pointing it out... Mac: Look at this:

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060910/ap_on_re_us/airport_arrest

Very little happens by mistake, or coincidence with the Jihadis!

“Ghamen” is a family name will known to Bin Laden; it’s his mother’s Maiden name; and also the Maiden name of his First wife, since he married his First cousin, named Alia Ghanem, when he was 17 years old.

Granted, his mother’s family was supposedly from Syria, and bin Laden is supposedly a “Saudi”, and this guy, is supposedly a “Yemeni”; but we know that Bin Laden is really of Yemeni/Hadramuti Blood, and I wouldn’t at all be surprised, if his mother’s and first wife’s family, though “Syrian”, originated either in Yemen, or in the Asir Province of Saudi, right north of Yemen, and for all intents and purposes, is a Yemeni “colony” within Saudi Arabia!

Just pointing it out…

]]> By: Carol Johnson http://macsmind.com/wordpress/news/the-scenes-the-clintonistas-didnt-want-america-to-see/comment-page-1/#comment-421 Carol Johnson Sun, 10 Sep 2006 15:57:51 +0000 http://www.macsmind.com/wordpress/2006/09/10/the-scenes-the-clintonistas-didnt-want-america-to-see/#comment-421 I haven't been able to see the clips yet...they seem to take forever to load on my system. I understand from Michelle Malkin's site though, that about an hour over the two nights has been cut from the program. What THAT means, I have no idea. Meanwhile we have the Democrats assurance that "you'll just have to trust us...we know better than you what you NEED to see!" On Fox News Sunday this morning, it was the usual panel discussion. The movie wasn't discussed at all. However, in response to the question of "are we safe?" and "who is playing politics with security?" Juan Williams whined that it was somehow unfair that Bush should use 9/11 as his security issue because "it is his strongest issue" Juan, you numbskull, IT SHOULD BE EVERYBODY'S STRONGEST ISSUE!!! Bush is not standing on the sidelines forcing the Democrats to run and hide whenever national security issues are brought up. Their idea of national security is to pull into our shell and tighten ports, build up huge defenses around EVERY single piece of vulnerable infrastructure in the United States and hope (read dream) that the terrorists will give up and leave us alone! The really crazy one's don't even want to do that much. They believe in the power of "drum circles" and "magic spells" to protect us, along with replacing our beautiful flag with one of "pure" white surrender!! The "party of peace" and the "religeon of peace"...does it get any clearer than that? Carol I haven’t been able to see the clips yet…they seem to take forever to load on my system. I understand from Michelle Malkin’s site though, that about an hour over the two nights has been cut from the program. What THAT means, I have no idea. Meanwhile we have the Democrats assurance that “you’ll just have to trust us…we know better than you what you NEED to see!”

On Fox News Sunday this morning, it was the usual panel discussion. The movie wasn’t discussed at all. However, in response to the question of “are we safe?” and “who is playing politics with security?” Juan Williams whined that it was somehow unfair that Bush should use 9/11 as his security issue because “it is his strongest issue”

Juan, you numbskull, IT SHOULD BE EVERYBODY’S STRONGEST ISSUE!!! Bush is not standing on the sidelines forcing the Democrats to run and hide whenever national security issues are brought up. Their idea of national security is to pull into our shell and tighten ports, build up huge defenses around EVERY single piece of vulnerable infrastructure in the United States and hope (read dream) that the terrorists will give up and leave us alone! The really crazy one’s don’t even want to do that much. They believe in the power of “drum circles” and “magic spells” to protect us, along with replacing our beautiful flag with one of “pure” white surrender!! The “party of peace” and the “religeon of peace”…does it get any clearer than that?

Carol

]]>