On Bill O’Reilly show last night his guest was ABC’s Brian Ross and the subject was the effectiveness of “strong interrogation” techniques.
Allah Pundit has the video. I am not a fan of Brian Ross, he’s a hack who wants us to remember, “We’re journalists, not bloggers. But we do have a blotter.”, which he proudly displays on his Notice on his webpage.
Whatever Ross. So I can’t buy a whole lot of what this guy says, but I don’t need his testimony anyway. I know from experience that strong interrogation works to extract needed information to save lives.
In any case I use “stong interrogation” instead of the word “Torture” which is NOT what is being suggested, nor employed. Folks I had a lot worse done to me during my “Escape and Evade” in the Army.
But again, what if Mohammed Atta had been captured two days before 9/11 and we KNEW that he was involved in something huge that was going to kill thousands of Americans. Just how much would we care about his “rights”? Ask a survivor of 9/11 what they think.
gitmo elections politics bush war on terror bush cia detainee
Top Stories in the Blogosphere News
Microsoft Office 2008 for Mac. Starting at just $149.95 with free shipping.
The Commander in Chief at Work!
Reading List
No Response
The Right Nation
September 21st, 2006 at 9:25 am
1Contrordine: la tortura funziona…
Non sar?† un bella notizia per i cultori del politically correct, ma su Hot Air potete vedere un video di Brian Ross (di ABC News, non certo un covo di reazionari) che, intervistato da Bill O’Reilly, svela come la tecnica del waterboarding (i dettagli…
RSS feed for comments on this post · TrackBack URI
Leave a reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.