Mr. Plame Game himself, Tom McGuire has a well written argument about the fact that if anyone wanted to positively date Valerie (Liar, liar) Plame’s overseas service, they only need look at her records.
“So, did Ms. Plame perform service abroad for the CIA after July 1998? One place to look would be her CIA personnel files – by statute (Title 50, Section 403r, “Section 403r. Special annuity computation rules for certain employees’ service abroad”), CIA officers are entitled to an upward adjustment in their pension benefits for service abroad. This is from the Friday NY Times, describing Ms. Plame’s legal issue with her proposed book:
The letter [from the CIA human resources are to Ms. Plame], from February 2006, was entered into the Congressional Record by Representative Jay Inslee, Democrat of Washington, in January 2007. Mr. Inslee was introducing legislation to allow Ms. Wilson to qualify for a government annuity.
The letter said that Ms. Wilson had worked for the government since Nov. 9, 1985, for a total of “20 years, 7 days,” including “six years, one month and 29 days of overseas service.”
More background and the full text of the letter are in this post.
So by law we should have guessed that Ms. Plame’s service abroad was tracked in her personnel file (OK, I did guess exactly that last February), and in fact it was.
And the rest should fall into place nicely, yes? In response to questions about Ms. Plame’s service abroad, CIA lawyers or Patrick Fitzgerald and his Department of Justice investigators will cite her personnel file, which presumably has been maintained in accordance with standard CIA practice. Her file will document the most recent period for which she received credit for service abroad, thereby resolving the point about her qualification as a covert agent under the IIPA, right?
Not so fast.”
Read the rest.
It’s a good point and my guess is that the records will reflect what we have known all along, that she had not been out of the country in the five years previous to the ‘outing’. To prove that assertion wrong one would have to do is declass her records, or have her sign a release.
An FOIA wouldn’t work because agency operations are exempt. It’s been a while, but I’m going to look through a manual or two to see if in fact her record – at least her overseas dates – could be made public. After all at this point the public has a right to know.
No Response
clarice
June 3rd, 2007 at 11:24 pm
1http://www.americanthinker.com/2007/06/theres_a_hero_in_the_dock.html
Bobby
June 4th, 2007 at 10:30 am
2Mac, Clarice–
Thank you for your coverage when almost everyone else has moved on.
Clarice, Libby hired the wrong defense counsel. It should have been you.
One conclusion I draw from your summary is that concern for the country is difficult to find these days, doesn’t matter to which party you look. During the national Memorial Day telecast from the West-front of the Capitol, I was disgusted to see John Murtha using a true wounded American hero as a prop for the camera shot. What a sick contrast.
The Libby/Plame/Wilson circus is another sick contrast, a case study in how unabated corruption has corroded our institutions to the point where a true hero can be publicly destroyed before our eyes by the very institutions we depend upon to protect us and dispense justice. The perpetrators have no conscience, and no visible scintilla of care for the good of the country. It’s “get Bush, any way we can; destroy anyone we have to.” Had Fitzgerald been so fanatic in prosecuting terrorists when he had that responsibility, we’d consider him a hero. Instead, he has spent our resources to destroy a quiet hero of the war on terror. Does that make Fitzgerald an enemy of the US, an abettor of terror? How about a useful idiot of the “fifth column?” If you unjustly attack those fighting the war, doesn’t that make you an accomplice of our enemies?
I’ve come to believe that people like Murtha and Fitzgerald, and so many more on both sides of the divide, those who, willingly or otherwise, distract us from the dangers we face, keeping us from combatting our enemies while the dangers grow, understand at the end of the day what they have done. And I believe that these people, who have traded their country’s safety for their own desires, on days such as Memorial Day, or Veterans Day, or the Fourth of July, can only with great difficulty look West, across the Potomac, to Arlington. Because when they look to that place of honor they see themselves and their own failures reflecting back from the gravestones. They see how they have chosen to harm rather than serve their country. They cannot look in the direction of Arlington except in shame.
And that probably explains the stunning fanaticism we continue to witness in the Libby circus. The perpetrators cannot look upon real heroes without passionately hating what they see, their own shame and failings reflected back.
Thanks again for your steadfast work.
clarice
June 4th, 2007 at 2:52 pm
3Thank you for your very generous remarks, Bobby.
RSS feed for comments on this post · TrackBack URI
Leave a reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Top Stories in the Blogosphere News
Microsoft Office 2008 for Mac. Starting at just $149.95 with free shipping.
The Commander in Chief at Work!
News
Reading List