Like I said, Israel can forget about having a friend in the White House for the next four years.
“The incoming Obama administration is prepared to abandon George Bush’s doctrine of isolating Hamas by establishing a channel to the Islamist organisation, sources close to the transition team say.
The move to open contacts with Hamas, which could be initiated through the US intelligence services, would represent a definitive break with the Bush presidency’s ostracising of the group. The state department has designated Hamas a terrorist organisation, and in 2006 Congress passed a law banning US financial aid to the group.
The Guardian has spoken to three people with knowledge of the discussions in the Obama camp. There is no talk of Obama approving direct diplomatic negotiations with Hamas early on, but he is being urged by advisers to initiate low-level or clandestine approaches, and there is growing recognition in Washington that the policy of ostracising Hamas is counter-productive. A tested course would be to start contacts through Hamas and the US intelligence services, similar to the secret process through which the US engaged with the PLO in the 1970s. Israel did not become aware of the contacts until much later.
A UN resolution was agreed last night at the UN, calling for an immediate and unconditional ceasefire between Hamas and Israeli forces in Gaza. The resolution was passed, though the US, represented by secretary of state Condoleezza Rice, abstained.
Richard Haass, a diplomat under both Bush presidents who was named by a number of news organisations this week as Obama’s choice for Middle East envoy, supports low-level contacts with Hamas provided there is a ceasefire in place and a Hamas-Fatah reconciliation emerges.
Another potential contender for a foreign policy role in the Obama administration suggested that the president-elect would not be bound by the Bush doctrine of isolating Hamas.
“This is going to be an administration that is committed to negotiating with critical parties on critical issues,” the source said.”
Of course dialog with Hamas will be like opening the door to further negotiation with terrorist down the line. Something Obama said on many occassions that he planned to do.
“Secret envoys, multilateral six-party talk-like approaches. The total isolation of Hamas that we promulgated under Bush is going to end,” said Steve Clemons, the director of the American Strategy Programme at the New America Foundation. “You could do something through the Europeans. You could invent a structure that is multilateral. It is going to be hard for the neocons to swallow,” he said. “I think it is going to happen.”
It’s also be something that Jewish Americans will find hard to swallow, and help the GOP to spew the leftist anti-semites from Washington in the upcoming 2010 and 2012 elections.
Technorati Tags: Barack Obama, Hamas
3 Responses
ivehadit
January 8th, 2009 at 10:53 pm
1Mac, it seems to me that all this talking is just a ruse to make everything “look good”…which is all that apparently matters to the democrat party, imho. No substance, just flash. They willl give away all our treasures to make everyone “feel good” and pretend to be “safe”. And America, be damned because frankly, this group going into the WH now hates America, imho. Covert hostiles is what I call them. NOT GOOD. And if there is one word that defines them all it’s this: ENTITLEMENT. They are entitled to SO MUCH. Not.
Boy, George W. really socked it to ‘em yesterday with his comments about country over personal political power….Those words will hang tough over this administration’s head, imho.
Stay awake and alert. And be safe.
retire05
January 8th, 2009 at 11:04 pm
2And American Jews expect what? Were they not listening? Did they not read the papers? Did they not notice that Obama’s friends were all anti-Israel from Tony Rezko (Syrian) to Rashid Khalidi (Palestinian) to his connection to Edward Said through William Ayers? Did they not pay attention to Obama’s own words in his own book how he and Rashid and Rashid’s wife, Mona had many conversations over the Khalidi table and how Rashid gave Obama a new understanding about Palestine? Were American Jewish voters all asleep during the campaign?
Now, being loyal little Democrats is going to reap Jewish voters what they have sown. And they are not going to like it. The question is now whether their loyalty to the Democratic Party will trump their love of Israel.
Marilyn
January 9th, 2009 at 2:30 pm
3I thought the Jews were supposed to be smarter than the rest of us. They knew, but they voted for their socialist party anyway. Their common sense level is down there with the blacks who embrace Islam because “It’s African” when it was the Muslims who rounded them up and sold them into slavery. They condemn everybody else for buying and owning them, but embrace those who started it all. If the Muslims had not been making money by capturing and selling blacks as slaves, and getting away with it, the rest of the world would not have been buying them. So, The Jews voted this bunch of clowns in, they can live with the consequences. It’s too bad the rest of us have to suffer with them. Does anyone remember during the 2000 vote count when one talking head said, ” Kerry’s vote is expected to increase considerably in Fla. when absentee votes are counted because all of the rich Jews living in Israel usually vote heavily for Dems.” When I worked at the Polls we were told that a person had to live in the princinct to vote. Apparently there were special rules for the rich Jews who lived in Israel and voted in Fla. They made this bed. Let them lie in it.
RSS feed for comments on this post · TrackBack URI
Leave a reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Top Stories in the Blogosphere News
Microsoft Office 2008 for Mac. Starting at just $149.95 with free shipping.
The Commander in Chief at Work!
News
Reading List