There’s a lot of small things but nothing specific I can put my finger on right now, but I think o’l Danny Boy is trying to cover up the fact he was orchestrating news stories for the Clinton’s.

Even a copy they were sent still shows the same issues about the fonts and stuff.

Since the documents were forged, the content of the documents are also brought into question.

After all why forge a true document instead of just supplying the original?

Rather is going to get himself hung out to dry on this one, because the network can take the homework the blogs did for them and use it in their defense.

They may not use the ones who broke the story, but if they don’t get a certified document expert to duplicate the work they would have to be fools.

Also other stories I have read on this today say Rather is going with the premise that he was only a newsreader but this is contradicted by how he was personally involved up to his neck in gathering , writing and then telling the story.