<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Foley Setup? &#8211; Part XXI &#8211; The Smoking Gun?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://macsmind.com/wordpress/news/foley-setup-part-xxi-the-smoking-gun/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://macsmind.com/wordpress/news/foley-setup-part-xxi-the-smoking-gun/</link>
	<description>Official Blog of the MacRanger Radio Show on Blog Talk Radio</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 14:48:20 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Flopping Aces &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Back We Go To FoleyGate</title>
		<link>http://macsmind.com/wordpress/news/foley-setup-part-xxi-the-smoking-gun/comment-page-1/#comment-974</link>
		<dc:creator>Flopping Aces &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Back We Go To FoleyGate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Oct 2006 18:05:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.macsmind.com/wordpress/2006/10/09/foley-setup-part-xxi-the-smoking-gun/#comment-974</guid>
		<description>[...] Macranger is hearing the same thing from his sources: Sources today tell me that the ethics committee IS, along with their ‚Äúwho knew what and when‚Äù, is looking at whether or not there was any ‚Äúevidence‚Äù witholding on the part of Democrats or of their operatives. Again, Foley‚Äôs activities aside, if it comes to light that Democratic operatives, or as it is believed at least one member of the Democratic Leadership had prior knowledge of Foley‚Äôs activities, the recoil would destroy democratic ‚Äúmomentum‚Äù in the last few weeks of the election. As I was told, ‚ÄúThere is a gag order‚Äù. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Macranger is hearing the same thing from his sources: Sources today tell me that the ethics committee IS, along with their ‚Äúwho knew what and when‚Äù, is looking at whether or not there was any ‚Äúevidence‚Äù witholding on the part of Democrats or of their operatives. Again, Foley‚Äôs activities aside, if it comes to light that Democratic operatives, or as it is believed at least one member of the Democratic Leadership had prior knowledge of Foley‚Äôs activities, the recoil would destroy democratic ‚Äúmomentum‚Äù in the last few weeks of the election. As I was told, ‚ÄúThere is a gag order‚Äù. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: retire05</title>
		<link>http://macsmind.com/wordpress/news/foley-setup-part-xxi-the-smoking-gun/comment-page-1/#comment-973</link>
		<dc:creator>retire05</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Oct 2006 15:20:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.macsmind.com/wordpress/2006/10/09/foley-setup-part-xxi-the-smoking-gun/#comment-973</guid>
		<description>I believe it was Putnam that asked Emanuel about the emails, although I could be wrong.  The &quot;I never SAW them&quot; answer is typical Clintonista speak.  In other words, &quot;sure, I knew about them, but I never SAW them&quot;, a typical CYA response.
So we are to believe that Rogers told the DCCC that he had some HOT information that would rip a hole in the Republican party and the DCCC ignored him?  Hardly.  The Dems are in the fight of their lives and as exampled in DeLay&#039;s district, they will do anything to win.
No surprise there.  The surprise could be that Republicans come out in record numbers this November for one reason and one reason only, to let the left know we don&#039;t accept their propaganda politics.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe it was Putnam that asked Emanuel about the emails, although I could be wrong.  The &#8220;I never SAW them&#8221; answer is typical Clintonista speak.  In other words, &#8220;sure, I knew about them, but I never SAW them&#8221;, a typical CYA response.<br />
So we are to believe that Rogers told the DCCC that he had some HOT information that would rip a hole in the Republican party and the DCCC ignored him?  Hardly.  The Dems are in the fight of their lives and as exampled in DeLay&#8217;s district, they will do anything to win.<br />
No surprise there.  The surprise could be that Republicans come out in record numbers this November for one reason and one reason only, to let the left know we don&#8217;t accept their propaganda politics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DubiousD</title>
		<link>http://macsmind.com/wordpress/news/foley-setup-part-xxi-the-smoking-gun/comment-page-1/#comment-972</link>
		<dc:creator>DubiousD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Oct 2006 06:23:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.macsmind.com/wordpress/2006/10/09/foley-setup-part-xxi-the-smoking-gun/#comment-972</guid>
		<description>Drudge&#039;s radio show on Sunday played part of a TV interview Rahm Emmanuel did with George Stephanopolos.  George asked Rahm, &quot;Did you know about the Foley e-mails before the story broke?&quot;  Rahm replied, &quot;I never saw them.&quot;  Note Rahm&#039;s choice of words.  When George put the question to him a second time, Rahm repeated that &quot;I never saw them.&quot;

Somebody&#039;s been consulting with counsel, eh?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Drudge&#8217;s radio show on Sunday played part of a TV interview Rahm Emmanuel did with George Stephanopolos.  George asked Rahm, &#8220;Did you know about the Foley e-mails before the story broke?&#8221;  Rahm replied, &#8220;I never saw them.&#8221;  Note Rahm&#8217;s choice of words.  When George put the question to him a second time, Rahm repeated that &#8220;I never saw them.&#8221;</p>
<p>Somebody&#8217;s been consulting with counsel, eh?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: clarice</title>
		<link>http://macsmind.com/wordpress/news/foley-setup-part-xxi-the-smoking-gun/comment-page-1/#comment-971</link>
		<dc:creator>clarice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Oct 2006 04:23:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.macsmind.com/wordpress/2006/10/09/foley-setup-part-xxi-the-smoking-gun/#comment-971</guid>
		<description>SOmeone should contact Burton at the DCCC (I can&#039;t)..and ask him about this:
Rogers has claimed on DCCC site (comments scrubbed) working with
Burton on the Foley story.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SOmeone should contact Burton at the DCCC (I can&#8217;t)..and ask him about this:<br />
Rogers has claimed on DCCC site (comments scrubbed) working with<br />
Burton on the Foley story.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

