Comments on: Foley Setup? – Part XX – Another day, another page, …… http://macsmind.com/wordpress/news/foley-setup-part-xx-another-day-another-page/ Official Blog of the MacRanger Radio Show on Blog Talk Radio Tue, 07 Feb 2012 14:48:20 -0600 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.3 By: azdad http://macsmind.com/wordpress/news/foley-setup-part-xx-another-day-another-page/comment-page-1/#comment-933 azdad Mon, 09 Oct 2006 18:50:19 +0000 http://www.macsmind.com/wordpress/2006/10/08/foley-setup-part-xx-another-day-another-page/#comment-933 Geez, Clarice! I haven't diagramed a sentence in 50 yrs. Do you think WAPO staff old enuff or smart enuff to do that? Of course their way does advance their evident agenda. Then too, if they had not included the 'outwardly gay' phrase, people could have, like I did with the local version, think "Hey, a Republican congressman took him to task in 2000." Including it, I guess, is another case of one gay covering for another?? Too cute for me. Geez, Clarice! I haven’t diagramed a sentence in 50 yrs. Do you think WAPO staff old enuff or smart enuff to do that? Of course their way does advance their evident agenda.
Then too, if they had not included the ‘outwardly gay’ phrase, people could have, like I did with the local version, think “Hey, a Republican congressman took him to task in 2000.” Including it, I guess, is another case of one gay covering for another??
Too cute for me.

]]> By: clarice http://macsmind.com/wordpress/news/foley-setup-part-xx-another-day-another-page/comment-page-1/#comment-932 clarice Mon, 09 Oct 2006 17:22:08 +0000 http://www.macsmind.com/wordpress/2006/10/08/foley-setup-part-xx-another-day-another-page/#comment-932 http://americanthinker.com/comments.php?comments_id=6313 http://americanthinker.com/comments.php?comments_id=6313

]]> By: azdad http://macsmind.com/wordpress/news/foley-setup-part-xx-another-day-another-page/comment-page-1/#comment-931 azdad Mon, 09 Oct 2006 15:50:44 +0000 http://www.macsmind.com/wordpress/2006/10/08/foley-setup-part-xx-another-day-another-page/#comment-931 I did conclude from first reading that Kolbe confronted Foley in 2000. Now I'm totally confused. I did conclude from first reading that Kolbe confronted Foley in 2000. Now I’m totally confused.

]]> By: azdad http://macsmind.com/wordpress/news/foley-setup-part-xx-another-day-another-page/comment-page-1/#comment-930 azdad Mon, 09 Oct 2006 15:48:03 +0000 http://www.macsmind.com/wordpress/2006/10/08/foley-setup-part-xx-another-day-another-page/#comment-930 For what its worth, the local headline for this story (Arizona Republic) uses the headline: "Kolbe knew of e-mails by Foley in 2000" and deletes the phrase "the only outwardly gay Republican in Congress". Otherwise, word-for-word. It's hard not to conclude that Kolbe knew in 2000 from this version also. For what its worth, the local headline for this story (Arizona Republic) uses the headline: “Kolbe knew of e-mails by Foley in 2000″ and deletes the phrase “the only outwardly gay Republican in Congress”. Otherwise, word-for-word. It’s hard not to conclude that Kolbe knew in 2000 from this version also.

]]> By: clarice http://macsmind.com/wordpress/news/foley-setup-part-xx-another-day-another-page/comment-page-1/#comment-929 clarice Mon, 09 Oct 2006 14:56:25 +0000 http://www.macsmind.com/wordpress/2006/10/08/foley-setup-part-xx-another-day-another-page/#comment-929 I've written the WaPo about how misleading this article is and we are running a piece on it in the AT. The headline and lead graph suggest Kolbe knew about the letter in 2000, but the story indicates he first learned about it a few weeks. That is to say the writer misleads the readers into thinking the email was learned of, not written , in 2000. I’ve written the WaPo about how misleading this article is and we are running a piece on it in the AT.

The headline and lead graph suggest Kolbe knew about the letter in 2000, but the story indicates he first learned about it a few weeks. That is to say the writer misleads the readers into thinking the email was learned of, not written , in 2000.

]]>