Mr. “New Republican” asks:

“What would it mean to “win” the healthcare fight?

For some, the answer is obvious: beat back the president’s proposals, defeat the House bill, stand back and wait for 1994 to repeat itself.

The problem is that if we do that… we’ll still have the present healthcare system. Meaning that we’ll have (1) flat-lining wages, (2) exploding Medicaid and Medicare costs and thus immense pressure for future tax increases, (3) small businesses and self-employed individuals priced out of the insurance market, and (4) a lot of uninsured or underinsured people imposing costs on hospitals and local governments.

We’ll have entrenched and perpetuated some of the most irrational features of a hugely costly and under-performing system, at the expense of entrepreneurs and risk-takers, exactly the people the Republican party exists to champion.

Not a good outcome.”

Of course since Frum long ago chucked basic conservative principles he wouldn’t have to ask this question. Conservatives do have an answer for healthcare reform, but Frum wouldn’t recognize it, simply because he – like the left – knows, but doesn’t like the conservative fix for the issue.

Perhaps he would like to explore the fixes before moaning about “What would we do”?

Technorati Tags: , , , , ,