Dispicable enough to demand the New York Times fire Paul Krugman? Yeah, dream on, but if you’re an American and today are morning with us the travesty of 9/11, you ought to demand his ouster and condemnation.

“Is it just me, or are the 9/11 commemorations oddly subdued?

Actually, I don’t think it’s me, and it’s not really that odd.

What happened after 9/11 — and I think even people on the right know this, whether they admit it or not — was deeply shameful. Te atrocity should have been a unifying event, but instead it became a wedge issue. Fake heroes like Bernie Kerik, Rudy Giuliani, and, yes, George W. Bush raced to cash in on the horror. And then the attack was used to justify an unrelated war the neocons wanted to fight, for all the wrong reasons.

A lot of other people behaved badly. How many of our professional pundits — people who should have understood very well what was happening — took the easy way out, turning a blind eye to the corruption and lending their support to the hijacking of the atrocity?

The memory of 9/11 has been irrevocably poisoned; it has become an occasion for shame. And in its heart, the nation knows it.

I’m not going to allow comments on this post, for obvious reasons.”

No, it’s just you. You won’t allow comments because you’re a gutless f*cking smuck. You’re a fucking pimple on the ass of America and you know what you do with pimples?

UPDATE: The Ny Times has pulled the post. Could an editorial correction be forthcoming? But Gateway Pundit has the screenshot.