So, IF Weiner does go for an investigation in the hack prank, and goes after the dastardly person who alled did it, AND if it goes to court, then the accused hacker prankster would have the right to have Weiner submit to a photo lineup – of sorts – to prove the pict isn’t his. Now we have handwriting experts, psychiatric experts and all kinds of other experts that get called into court all the time. So somewhere there has a to be a “willie in the underwear” expert somewhere.

So according to discovery rules the hacker/prankster’s lawyer could petition the court to have Weiner’s junk examined under cross examination.

It’s silly I know, but no more silly than his excuses so far.

Personally if Weiner continues the ridiculous charade then I hope it goes all the way to court. Talk about the trial of the century!