Now that we’ve cleaned house of at least one of the communist that infected it, why stop there. Charlie Rangel has long since worn out his welcome, but will Nancy Pelosi sack him?

Naw…

“Why is House Speaker Nancy Pelosi refusing a growing chorus of calls to drop the hammer on ethics-challenged Charlie Rangel?

Because, at the moment, doing nothing creates a lot less trouble for Pelosi than doing anything, current and former House aides tell POLITICO.

Stripping the Harlem Democrat of his chairmanship of the House Ways and Means Committee would force Pelosi to make a series of unpalatable decisions about Rangel’s successor that would create a ruckus in the Democratic caucus.

It would also infuriate the Congressional Black Caucus, which is still sore over Pelosi’s decision to strip committees from former Louisiana Rep. Bill Jefferson – even after Jefferson had been found with a wad of tainted cash in his kitchen.

“Unless they find $90,000 in his freezer, like they did with Jefferson, we’re going to wait [for the outcome of a House ethics probe],” said a Democratic aide familiar with Pelosi’s thinking on the matter.”

Well they don’t need $90,000 in the freezer, they have him on enough to possibly throw him in jail for tax fraud. But with the Dems looking bad for 2010 they can ill afford Rangel’s baggage.

Technorati Tags: , , ,