Big deal.

“Documents released today by the House Judiciary Committee show that Karl Rove, the former top political adviser to President George W. Bush, played a critical role in the firing of the U.S. attorney in New Mexico following the 2006 elections.

The 6,000-plus pages of documents, which include transcripts from interviews with Rove and former White House Counsel Harriet Miers, make it clear that Rove and other White House aides were much more involved in the U.S. attorney firings than previously reported.

“After all the delay and despite all the obfuscation, lies and spin, this basic truth can no longer be denied: Karl Rove and his cohorts at the Bush White House were the driving force behind several of these firings, which were done for improper reasons,” Judiciary Committee Chairman John Conyers (D-Mich.) said in a statement.

Conyers said he has sent the material to a special prosecutor, who is investigating the firings on behalf of the Justice Department.”

And you would expect John “Abuse Employees at Will” Conyers of coming out with anything else? I mean after all this is the senile nut job that held impeachment hearings for Bush in the White House basement.

How “colored” is this witch judgment? Rep. Lamar Smith:

“Despite all evidence to the contrary, House Democrats continue to falsely accuse former Bush administration official Karl Rove of wrongdoing in the dismissal of several U.S. Attorneys,” Smith said in a statement. “But the interviews reveal no evidence of wrongdoing in the firings.”

Because there wasn’t, and just because a partisan political hack says so doesn’t amount to a hill of beans.

Compare this to Holder’s politicizing of the DOJ and, even if, it makes the firing of political appointees pointless.