22 Jan
Posted by MacRanger as Uncategorized
“2009-2010 will rank with 1913-14, 1933-36, 1964-65 and 1981-82 as years that will permanently change our government, politics and lives. Just as the stars were aligned for Wilson, Roosevelt, Johnson and Reagan, they are aligned for Obama. Simply put, we enter his administration as free-enterprise, market-dominated, laissez-faire America. We will shortly become like Germany, France, the United Kingdom, or Sweden — a socialist democracy in which the government dominates the economy, determines private-sector priorities and offers a vastly expanded range of services to many more people at much higher taxes.
Obama will accomplish his agenda of “reform” under the rubric of “recovery.” Using the electoral mandate bestowed on a Democratic Congress by restless voters and the economic power given his administration by terrified Americans, he will change our country fundamentally in the name of lifting the depression. His stimulus packages won’t do much to shorten the downturn — although they will make it less painful — but they will do a great deal to change our nation.
In implementing his agenda, Barack Obama will emulate the example of Franklin D. Roosevelt. (Not the liberal mythology of the New Deal, but the actuality of what it accomplished.) When FDR took office, he was enormously successful in averting a total collapse of the banking system and the economy. But his New Deal measures only succeeded in lowering the unemployment rate from 23 percent in 1933, when he took office, to 13 percent in the summer of 1937. It never went lower. And his policies of over-regulation generated such business uncertainty that they triggered a second-term recession. Unemployment in 1938 rose to 17 percent and, in 1940, on the verge of the war-driven recovery, stood at 15 percent. (These data and the real story of Hoover’s and Roosevelt’s missteps, uncolored by ideology, are available in The Forgotten Man by Amity Shlaes, copyright 2007.)
But in the name of a largely unsuccessful effort to end the Depression, Roosevelt passed crucial and permanent reforms that have dominated our lives ever since, including Social Security, the creation of the Securities and Exchange Commission, unionization under the Wagner Act, the federal minimum wage and a host of other fundamental changes.
Obama’s record will be similar, although less wise and more destructive. He will begin by passing every program for which liberals have lusted for decades, from alternative-energy sources to school renovations, infrastructure repairs and technology enhancements. These are all good programs, but they normally would be stretched out for years. But freed of any constraint on the deficit — indeed, empowered by a mandate to raise it as high as possible — Obama will do them all rather quickly.
But it is not his spending that will transform our political system, it is his tax and welfare policies. In the name of short-term stimulus, he will give every American family (who makes less than $200,000) a welfare check of $1,000 euphemistically called a refundable tax credit. And he will so sharply cut taxes on the middle class and the poor that the number of Americans who pay no federal income tax will rise from the current one-third of all households to more than half. In the process, he will create a permanent electoral majority that does not pay taxes, but counts on ever-expanding welfare checks from the government. The dependency on the dole, formerly limited in pre-Clinton days to 14 million women and children on Aid to Families with Dependent Children, will now grow to a clear majority of the American population.
Will he raise taxes? Why should he? With a congressional mandate to run the deficit up as high as need be, there is no reason to raise taxes now and risk aggravating the depression. Instead, Obama will follow the opposite of the Reagan strategy. Reagan cut taxes and increased the deficit so that liberals could not increase spending. Obama will raise spending and increase the deficit so that conservatives cannot cut taxes. And, when the economy is restored, he will raise taxes with impunity, since the only people who will have to pay them would be rich Republicans.”
None of this is news, you’ve heard it here. In three days he’s already greatly weakened our national security, signed orders to set the terrorists free and signed over more babies to their death through unfettered abortion.
This is an evil and very dangerous man and we’ve only begun to see just how much that is true. So now is the time to begin to act. Now is the time to begin to wrest – through peaceful and legal means- this Country back from those who are about to destroy it.
How?
I will have more in the days and weeks to come.
Technorati Tags: Barack Obama,
8 Responses
ivehadit
January 22nd, 2009 at 9:42 pm
1Mac, great comments. Awaiting your further comments!
shield
January 22nd, 2009 at 11:42 pm
2BO is not eligible to be president so everything he signs is not valid.
Rlqretired
January 23rd, 2009 at 6:44 am
3Obama’s weakness is his birth, passport and educational records which he has sealed from public view to cover up his fraudulent record. Open these records and Obama will be exposed as the liar, fraud and usurper that he is. It’s just that simple.
Brian N. Larsen
January 23rd, 2009 at 11:52 pm
4Aquit him now , before its to late .He made history , thats why they voted for him -nobody listened to the words that came out of his mouth , now every one is saying – oh no what have we done?
coler has nothing to do with runing this country………..
laura
January 24th, 2009 at 3:32 am
5He is the antichrist AND Satan incarnate. The 666 beast, having blasphemed the Holy Spirit, IS Satan incarnate. That’s Obama.
Nicole
January 24th, 2009 at 5:23 pm
6I believe he is setting the stage for the antichrist but he’s certainly not the antichrist. The antichrist shows up after the rapture which hasn’t happened. I agree, he’s not the type of Christian I am familiar with but I just don’t see him as the antichrist. Plus the antichrist is bisexual and pro gay, Obama is against gay marriage and so far not bisexual. I think its just easier to label him this way because you cant see a man of color with this much power just being a dude who wants to fix things, I am conservative and opposed to his is opening abortion funding up but Clinton did the same thing when he took office why wasn’t he the antichrist? Obama is opposed to gay marriage. Hillary voted the same on abortion gay marriage and civil unions as Barrack but conservatives went for her as opposed to Mcain or Barack in the primaries. Why wasn’t Hillary the devil incarnate? How amazingly hypocritical.
I really believe that if he were white, we would not be having this conversation. Bush (who I voted for twice) only showed he was a Christian by banning all things abortion and gay rights but any conservative (doesn’t have to be a Christian) can do that – nothing in his character or actions dictated Christianity, you can overlook that but Obama having showed character but not banning abortions makes him the antichrist? The grace republicans showed Bush went beyond rational but for Obama, no grace. The devil incarnate? Read your bible people …just say I don’t trust him because he’s a powerful black man, stop pretending he’s the antichrist AND if he IS the antichrist, he MUST have power and do what’s being done because it’s divinely written and will occur no matter what and any Christian who is “scared to death: of him because they think he is the antichrist is stupid because we know what happens at the end of the story. We win. Idiots
Julie
January 25th, 2009 at 7:02 pm
7Wow Nicole, can I just say that I disagree with everything you said? That would pretty much cover it. I’d like to see the Bible verse that says that the antichrist will be bisexual? I am almost certain he would be pro-gay, but I’m pretty sure the Bible doesn’t address that.
I am super opposed to Hillary and Obama, but the reality is, we knew what Hillary stood for, we still haven’t the faintest on what Obama stands for, except that he wants to kill every baby he can get his hands on and voted present on who knows how many things because he was ashamed of what he believed.
Where are you seeing grace for Bush? Good heavens, he’s gotten raked over the coals for every single thing he has done in this term. I know very few people who aren’t radically anti-Bush.
This has nothing to do with the fact that Obama is black, I would be just as opposed to him if he was white. Besides, he just played the black card for black votes and support, he’s just as much white as he is black. Most people don’t even know he’s half white because he’s so darn racist against whites.
I’m not saying he IS the antichrist, I’m saying time will tell. If he’s so amazing and upright, why has he sealed all his records? No republican ever could have gotten away with that.
G
January 27th, 2009 at 6:48 pm
8Most of these blogs illustrate the famine that is in the world today. The famine for God’s word. Don’t look here folks, if you want the truth, but read your Bibles, chapter by chapter, verse by verse. Read it for yourselves and do not that because someone say’s “it’s in the bible” that it is so. You must know for yourselves.
RSS feed for comments on this post · TrackBack URI
Leave a reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Top Stories in the Blogosphere News
Microsoft Office 2008 for Mac. Starting at just $149.95 with free shipping.
The Commander in Chief at Work!
News
Reading List
Macsmind – Politics, Culture and Breaking News and the 2012 Presidential Election! Copyright 2008, Macsmind is a registered trademark of Macsmind Media - BloggingPro theme by: Design Disease