03 Dec
Posted by MacRanger as Uncategorized
“December 3, 2008) – In a highly unusual move, U.S. Associate Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas has asked his colleagues on the court to consider the request of an East Brunswick, N.J. attorney who has filed a lawsuit challenging President-elect Barack Obama’s status as a United States citizen.
Thomas’s action took place after Justice David Souter had rejected a petition known as an application for a stay of writ of certiorari that asked the court to prevent the meeting of the Electoral College on Dec. 15, which will certify Obama as the 44th president of the United States and its first African-American president.
The court has scheduled a Dec. 5 conference on the writ — just 10 days before the Electoral College meets.
The high court’s only African American is bringing the matter to his colleagues as a result of the writ that was filed by attorney Leo Donofrio. Donofrio sued the New Jersey Secretary of State Nina Wells, contending that Obama was not qualified to be on the state’s presidential ballot because of Donofrio’s own questions about Obama citizenship.
Donofrio is a retired lawyer who identifies himself as a “citizen’s advocate.” The AFRO learned that he is a contributor to naturalborncitizen.wordpress.com, a Web site that raises questions about Obama’s citizenship.
…to prevent the meeting of the Electoral College on Dec. 15, which
will certify Obama as the 44th president of the United States…Calls made to Donofrio’s residence were not returned to the AFRO by press time.
Donofrio is questioning Obama’s citizenship because the former Illinois senator, whose mom was from Kansas, was born in Hawaii and his father was a Kenyan national. Therefore, Donofrio argues, Obama’s dual citizenship does not make Obama “a natural born citizen” as required by Article II, Section I of the U.S. Constitution, which states:
“No person except a natural born citizen, or a citizen of the United States, at the time of the adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the office of President…”
Donofrio had initially tried to remove the names not only of Obama, but also the names of Republican Party presidential nominee John McCain and Socialist Workers’ Party Roger Calero from appearing on the Nov. 4 general election ballot in his home state of New Jersey.”
This hasn’t been picked up by other news sources yet, and I’m not familiar with AFRO news service (AFRO?), but if this is legit it could be huge.
Previous: Constitutional Crisis – The Real Question of Obama’s Citizenship
8 Responses
ordi
December 4th, 2008 at 1:20 am
1Mac
Not sure where this issue will end but this IS a legitimate story.
Detriot Free Press has an article at the link below on the same subject. It quotes Eugene Volokh of the University of California at Los Angeles – He is a Professor of Law at UCLA School of Law. Eugene also has the blog The Volokh Conspiracy.
http://www.freep.com/article/20081203/NEWS15/81203128
Ted
December 4th, 2008 at 4:11 am
2Folks, this is NOT rocket science.
Since the Constitution’s Article II requires our President to be a “natural born citizen” (not merely a “citizen” as allowed for those living when the Constitution was enacted), meaning both parents were US “citizens” when the child was born (altho parents need not be “natural born” citizens), there’s NO WAY Obama can be President — regardless of being born in Kenya OR Hawaii — that is, to be “natural born citizen” (as opposed to being a “citizen”) being born on American soil is insufficient unless both parents are “citizens”. Obama’s dad was NOT an American citizen. He was a citizen of the UK (administering Kenya at the time).
Bottom line, the questions of (1) the birth certificate, (2) where Obama was born, and (3) whether Obama was a “citizen” of the US, all miss the mark. The issue before the Supreme Court is “natural born citizen” of the US, NOT “citizen” of the US. Under the Constitution, a Senator or House Member, for example, need only be a “citizen”, but a President, uniquely, must be a “natural born citizen”.
Obama is not. Case closed.
Kitty
December 4th, 2008 at 8:06 am
3Let’s do a hypothetical. Suppose it’s learned that BO is not qualified to be president. What do you think will happen — and the repercussions?
…
Dan
December 4th, 2008 at 8:42 am
4Kitty
December 4th, 2008 at 8:06 am
3
Let’s do a hypothetical. Suppose it’s learned that BO is not qualified to be president. What do you think will happen — and the repercussions?
====================
Well, he should be disqualified, plain and simple, along with Biden. As for repercussions, I believe that their will far more if he is disqualified and not removed.
I believe that BO was counting on this scenario. The issue would be dropped, or the spineless wouldn’t reject him if he was disqualified, because of the liberal race baiting. Like I said above, If BO is unqualified for the Presidency, and not removed, then I anticipate that the KKK or some similar group with remove him. I don’t see BO finishing his first year if he is unqualified.
I believe that this should have been dealt with as soon as ANY person officially announces their candidacy. Until it is verified, they are not allowed on ANY primary ballot.
Bob Sloggin
December 4th, 2008 at 9:04 am
5The moonbats will riot, the blacks will riot, and a fun time will be had by all!
Joe
December 4th, 2008 at 6:30 pm
6Ted said:there’s NO WAY Obama can be President — regardless of being born in Kenya OR Hawaii — that is, to be “natural born citizen” (as opposed to being a “citizen”) being born on American soil is insufficient unless both parents are “citizens”.
Isn’t this in conflict with the law that grants American citizenship to the children of illigal immigrants? Or immigrants that haven’t atained citizenship yet? Can you explain the difference, please Ted?
Thanks,
Joe
Terrence
December 4th, 2008 at 7:29 pm
7Saint Obama will NOT step aside; He has been anointed, and His rule will be by Divine Right, not according to some paper document concocted by mere men, like the Constitution. And, as Bob Sloggin points out, if He is forced out of His divine rule, there will be riots in the streets.
Kitty
December 5th, 2008 at 2:02 pm
8My e-mail chat group has been a-buzz with this issue. One of the group, a lawyer (in Chicago no less!), thinks: “The USSC took the case in order to shut it down, once and for all, no other reason.” I agree.
He also thinks: “This paranoia is beyond silly…” I don’t agree.
As Joe the Farmer said:
“The question not being asked by the holders of power, who dismiss this as a rightwing conspiracy, is what’s the downside of disclosing? This is a legitimate issue of inquiry because Barack Obama has turned it into one. The growing number of people who demand an answer in conformance with the Constitution are doing their work; the people’s watchdogs aren’t.”
http://www.americanthinker.com/2008/11/why_the_barack_obama_birth_cer.html
…
RSS feed for comments on this post · TrackBack URI
Leave a reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Top Stories in the Blogosphere News
Microsoft Office 2008 for Mac. Starting at just $149.95 with free shipping.
The Commander in Chief at Work!
News
Reading List
Most Popular Posts
Macsmind – Politics, Culture and Breaking News and the 2012 Presidential Election! Copyright 2008, Macsmind is a registered trademark of Macsmind Media - BloggingPro theme by: Design Disease