It’s a no win situation. If the auto companies tank, the effect on the economy would be devastaing. Yet throwing good money after bad management would be equally devastating and quite foolish.
Yet here is a plan we hatched on the MacRanger Show last night.
First, in order to secure any cash from the Government the auto companies would have to summit to a top to bottom audit of their books. Perhaps the GAO could spearhead this endeavor, or even contracted auditing firms. This audit would be comprehensive, yet brief given the critical nature of the economy.
The audits would examine the books to see just where these companies actually got into the fix they are in today. No stone would be unturned. Yes we know it’s the economy and other factors that contributed, but one would suspect that their overall business model or practices are some what at fault. Let’s not forget that it’s the taxpayer’s money that is being asked for. The price we demand is full disclosure of their accounting practices and methods of business.
Upon the completion of the audit a comprehensive plan would be recommended and then, and only then – and upon contractual agreement with the Government, could the companies secure funding in the form of a interest loan to get back on their feet.
In this way the money would be returned to the tax payers with interest, the bad business which led to their downturn would be exposed and corrected.
Short of this I can see no feasible way to bailout auto makers.
What do you think? Comment away!
3 Responses
Rich
December 4th, 2008 at 10:07 pm
1My idea is that they apply for a Line Of Credit from some of the banks that got TARP money. Lets see how much of a risk they are…
Cato
December 5th, 2008 at 6:56 am
2No Bailout.
The only way the auto companies can survive and prosper is to get rid of both management (mostly) and the UAW (completely – it’s the mindset as well as the actual contracts).
They need to go through a Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Reorganization.
If, and only if, they agree ahead of time that the Board will (1) replace the CEO and top management at the time of filing and (2) immediately reject the union contracts, then the government should provide guarantees for DIP financing.
retire05
December 5th, 2008 at 9:39 am
3Let them file Chapter 11. Then the court can appoint a board of trustees, along with auditors, to find out exactly why the bleeding has be going on for the last 20 years (at least with GM). Basically, it puts everything on hold and allows for the reorganization that the Big 3 claim they want. It also voids an oppressive union contract that can be renegotiated.
On the part of the UAW, they need to let the “surplus” work force that is paid 95% of their salaries to sit at home for years go. The UAW needs to be forced to get rid of their tony golf resort that has managed, under UAW management, to lose $13 million in the last five years. Also, the UAW must be willing to compress job titles, like all the unions have done in the last 10 years, so that a guy who puts on tires can fill in for the guy who installs dashboards, if need be. As it stands now, the UAW has fought “crossover” titles.
Last year, Honda built a new plant that currently employes 2,000 workers for $550 million. GM alone paid out $497 million for non-working, stay at home “surplus” workers.
And the goverment must be willing to suspend some of the stupid safety standards that have been forced on the Big 3 that Toyota, Honda and Mercedes don’t have to adhere to. You can’t make a Reynold’s Wrap vehicle that will ever be as safe as a F-250 in a wreck. More stupidity on the part of people who don’t even make good politicians much less good automotive CEOs.
RSS feed for comments on this post · TrackBack URI
Leave a reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Top Stories in the Blogosphere News
Microsoft Office 2008 for Mac. Starting at just $149.95 with free shipping.
The Commander in Chief at Work!
News
Reading List
Most Popular Posts