Not all the eggheads at Columbia have given in to stupidity. David M. Schizer, dean of the law school component of Columbia completely denounces the visit.

A controversy has developed about the invitation extended to President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad of Iran by the Columbia School of International and Public Affairs. Although Columbia Law School was not involved in arranging this invitation, we have received many inquiries about it.This event raises deep and complicated issues about how best to express our commitment to intellectual freedom, and to our free way of life. Although we believe in free and open debate at Columbia and should never suppress points of view, we are also committed to academic standards. A high-quality academic discussion depends on intellectual honesty but, unfortunately, Mr. Ahmadinejad has proven himself, time and again, to be uninterested in whether his words are true. Therefore, my personal opinion is that he should not be invited to speak. Mr. Ahmadinejad is a reprehensible and dangerous figure who presides over a repressive regime, is responsible for the death of American soldiers, denies the Holocaust, and calls for the destruction of Israel. It would be deeply regrettable if some misread this invitation as lending prestige or legitimacy to his views.

Our university is a pluralistic place, and I recognize that others within our community take a different view in good faith, and that they have the right to extend invitations that I personally would not extend. I know that we will learn from each other in discussing the difficult questions prompted by this invitation.”

Nevertheless Columbia will go with the visit and thus will pay dearly in loss of funding down the line as there are already moves to penalize them for this idiocy. That may come from the Jewish alumni revenue streams which are all but kissed goodbye at this point.

UPDATE: Bollinger apparently trying to quell things went into bad cop mode on Ahmadinejad launching into a 30 minute “blistering introduction”. Why am I not convinced of his sincerity. Would he have done the same to Hitler?

UPDATE II:¬† Here’s the Bollinger video.¬† The explanation he gives for letting Ahmadinejad speak is lame and he still will here about it down the road through the alumni. ¬† Additionally in spite of trying to bail out by the speech,¬† he may be possibly fired over this.¬† Nevertheless, here you go.