Newsweak throws out the stops – and journalism 101 – to go after what he called “Global Warming Deniers“. The only problem is that the editors must have been out to lunch as the factchecking is sadly lacking.
Marc Morano of the US Senate Committee on Environmental and Public Works writes:
“Newsweek Magazine‚Äôs cover story of August 13, 2007 entitled, ‚ÄúThe Truth About Denial‚Äù contains very little that could actually be considered balanced, objective or fair by journalistic standards. (LINK)
The one-sided editorial, masquerading as a “news article,” was written by Sharon Begley with Eve Conant, Sam Stein and Eleanor Clift and Matthew Philips and purports to examine the “well-coordinated, well-funded campaign by contrarian scientists, free-market think tanks and industry has created a paralyzing fog of doubt around climate change.”
The only problem is — Newsweek knew better. Reporter Eve Conant, who interviewed Senator James Inhofe (R-Okla.), the Ranking Member of the Environment & Public Works Committee, was given all the latest data proving conclusively that it is the proponents of man-made global warming fears that enjoy a monumental funding advantage over the skeptics. (A whopping $50 BILLION to a paltry $19 MILLION for skeptics ‚Äì Yes, that is BILLION to MILLION – see below )
This week‚Äôs ‚Äúnews article‚Äù in Newsweek follows the Magazine‚Äôs October 23, 2006 article which admitted the error of their ways in the 1970‚Äôs when they predicted dire global cooling.”
Read the rest and you’ll see why I’ve given NewsWeak has the name it deserves.
No Response
crosspatch
August 6th, 2007 at 1:17 pm
1I have no doubt that the temperature monitoring networks are showing man made global warming. Look at this picture and you can see how they make it. That is the Tuscon Arizona station if the the USHCN. USHCN is a network of “high quality” sites designed to monitor climate change. So what do they do? They site a station in Arizona right on top of an asphalt parking lot.
The problem is that this site isn’t atypical. Many sites are on building roofs, near parking lots, have air conditioner exhaust blowing on them, sited next to garbage incinerators, etc. In fact, properly sited locations show NO global warming in the past decade or so.
And to add insult to injury, it looks like the process they use to “adjust” the temperatures of some sites has a Y2K bug that causes the adjustment to go haywire starting in January of 2000 resulting in a skewing of the temperatures by an amount larger than the claimed amount of global warming of the entire previous century.
Yeah, it is man made global warming, alright. Bad location of monitoring stations and bad adjustments to the data are resulting in “warming” being seen in the data that might not really be there.
Check out these posts at Climate Audit. Those are postings having to do with the auditing of the USHCN network (tag=surface stations). It is just incredible.
crosspatch
August 6th, 2007 at 1:18 pm
2uh, oh. looks like my post got eaten by the spam filter. Macranger, can you kick that loose?
Juker
August 6th, 2007 at 10:47 pm
3crosspatch, the Hansen corrections are not affected by the “Y2K Bug” – largely mythical. It is just a regular old programming error, maybe. That 2000 was involved is funny but coincidental.
If you are a CA fan then great, me too. Just be careful with this stuff. CA is serious science but sometimes it is just exploring data and such, not ready for time prime even if I happen to believe a lot of it.
crosspatch
August 7th, 2007 at 8:08 am
4Juker, I have been there since the site opened up. Been reading Steves stuff since before he had a blog. There IS a y2k calculation problem in his adjustments. It usually comes in when people only use the last two digits of the year. There were a LOT of y2k bugs in a LOT of programs. Most got fixed before y2k so it wasn’t an issue. Bit if you are at year 00 and your adjustment depends on previous years it can blow up rather easily.
New article here on the subject.
RSS feed for comments on this post · TrackBack URI
Leave a reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Top Stories in the Blogosphere News
Microsoft Office 2008 for Mac. Starting at just $149.95 with free shipping.
The Commander in Chief at Work!
News
Reading List
Most Popular Posts
Macsmind – Politics, Culture and Breaking News and the 2012 Presidential Election! Copyright 2008, Macsmind is a registered trademark of Macsmind Media - BloggingPro theme by: Design Disease