You’ve got to love the irony that judge King is a Jimmy Carter appointee…
“In a case that could affect thousands of New Orleans residents rebuilding after Hurricane Katrina, a federal appeals court ruled Thursday that homeowners’ insurance policies did not cover flood damages caused by levee breaches that flooded 80 percent the city.
“This event was excluded from coverage under the plaintiffs’ insurance policies, and under Louisiana law, we are bound to enforce the unambiguous terms of their insurance contracts as written,” Judge Carolyn King wrote for a three-judge panel of the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.
“Accordingly, we conclude that the plaintiffs are not entitled to recover under their policies,” she wrote.
The panel overturned a November decision by a lower court judge that argued that language excluding water damage from some of their insurance policies was ambiguous.
Judge Stanwood Duval said the policies did not distinguish between floods caused by an act of God ‚Äî such as excessive rainfall ‚Äî and floods caused by an act of man, which would include the levee breaches following Katrina’s landfall.”
The language was never “ambiguous”, but very clearly state that you are not covered for flood – whether God caused it or not. Nevertheless it’s interesting that it’s Judge King who had a lot of opinions on Katrina and the aftermath as this radio transcript shows. Appears that she might have recused herself.
No Response
CommentGuy
August 2nd, 2007 at 12:36 pm
1My word, what’s the issue here.
For years it has been known that insurers didn’t cover flooding, that was the whole basis of reason for the creation of federal flood insurance to cover the gap.
But there is also a lot of good arguments to support that the program should be done away with to prevent repeat building in flood prone places and having to payout for flood damage over and over in the same location.
Right Voices » Blog Archive » Court rules against Katrina victims in flood insurance case
August 3rd, 2007 at 8:35 am
2[...] Mac points out that “the language was never ‚Äúambiguous‚Äù, but very clearly state that you are not covered for flood – whether God caused it or not. Nevertheless it‚Äôs interesting that it‚Äôs Judge King who had a lot of opinions on Katrina and the aftermath as this radio transcript shows. Appears that she might have recused herself. ” Bookmark to: [...]
RSS feed for comments on this post · TrackBack URI
Leave a reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Top Stories in the Blogosphere News
Microsoft Office 2008 for Mac. Starting at just $149.95 with free shipping.
The Commander in Chief at Work!
News
Reading List
Most Popular Posts