27 Aug
Posted by MacRanger as Uncategorized
I was having a cup of Cuban Coffee with – let’s call him “Edwardo”, who is leader of sorts in the Cuban community. Since Alberto Gonzales resigned today we talked a little about that and what I feel is a growing problem that Democrats have with hispanics in power. He surprised me with his response. Though a democrat he told me that they – meaning his compadres – have noticed over the last few years the democrat’s seemingly animosity against hispanics, particularly when they are in office, or even trying to get there. I replied that I thought Democrats have a lock on hispanics.
“That’s changing” he said. I don’t know, it seems they still have a hold that is strong enough but the fact that may in fact begin to change.
First, back in 2003 Democrats killed Miguel Estrada’s nomination to the Appeals Court. There was no other reason except that he was strongly conservative – so they said. Yet their opposition wasn’t only in the political realm. In that same year Democrats opposed a Hispanic media merger between Univision and the Hispanic Broadcasting Corporation
It is well known that in Florida the DNC works hard to keep hispanics only to the local level but will oppose them if they try to reach higher office unless they fit certain “criteria”. Just as they did nationwide – specifically in Colorado – in 2006.
Whatever the view that whites have of Gonzales, he was viewed as a hero among many hispanics, and they are not at all happy that it was basically “New Englanders” like Chuck Schumer and Patrick Leahy who gave him the most grief and generally forced his decision to resign.
Sure some would say that hispanics in Florida are just as angry over Republicans over the immigration fallout, but the fact is that the predominately Cuban and Carribian populations polled during the debate in Florida weren’t for the bill anyway and saw it as an affront to the generally lax immigration status they already have.
In anycase look for this to begin to develop further throughout the hispanic population in Florida going into next year’s election.
No Response
shield
August 27th, 2007 at 8:43 pm
1I think it’s awful what the rats did to Gonzales…and the Hispanic community should be pissed big time.
They treated Gonzales so completely disrespectful…I couldn’t believe it.
I wish the Hispanics would let those dirty rats know that Gonzales was the last straw…
All I can do is shake my head when I think of how Gonzales pulled himself up from being extremely poor and reached the heights he’s reached.
retire05
August 28th, 2007 at 7:17 am
2I have never been a fan of Gonzales’s but not because he is stupid, but because he does not have the personality to tell the Senate witch hunters to pound sand and if they have a problem with his legal firing of U.S. Attorney’s to take it to the SCOTUS. He should have closed the door in their faces. But he didn’t.
My choices for AG?
Ted Olsen: he lost his wife on 9/11 when she was on the plane that some terrorist thug flew into the Pentagon. Yeah, give me a man with an axe to grind. Let the Senate mad dogs go after a man with a “Cindy Sheehan” moral authority. Give me a pissed off, angry man who knows the costs of 9/11 and lost his beautiful, intelligent wife to thugs who has a score to settle.
Greg Abbott: currently the AG for the state of Texas. Argued for the 10 Commandments on the Capital green in Austin in front of SCOTUS and WON. Let the Democrats go after Abbott. After all, he is a handicapped American. He also does’t seem to have a problem going after the voter fraud that the Democrats used to defeat Henry Bonilla by registering illegal Mexicans.
The first time a Democrat asks Olsen a question he should start his answer with “Well, Senator, when I lost my wife on 9/11……” and Abbott could answer starting with “Senator, even though I am physically handicapped……….”
Both men have the ability to show the Democrats for the hateful, spiteful hacks they are. Gotta love it.
jondar
August 28th, 2007 at 10:10 am
3I am unable to understand why the Hispanic population favor the dems who are always their adversary, and the black-Americans as well. Who fought their equal rights all the way to the SC?
Unions are equally guilty of supporting anti-union dems like Peelosi, who’s family holdings are strong anti-union shops.
I would just say “NO” to the dems and their promises of “what do you want to hear?”, “do as I say, not as I do” BS rhetoric.
RSS feed for comments on this post · TrackBack URI
Leave a reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Top Stories in the Blogosphere News
Microsoft Office 2008 for Mac. Starting at just $149.95 with free shipping.
The Commander in Chief at Work!
News
Reading List
Most Popular Posts