CNN is covering the clash between conservative bloggers and President Bush over the (A) Bill.
“Different conservative blogs have different pet issues — government transparency, federal judges, Fred Thompson, to name a few.
But no issue in recent memory has united conservative bloggers like the debate over immigration. Their frustration has culminated in a full-scale revolt against the Bush administration and a Senate bill that activists say does little to solve the country’s border security problems.
President Bush’s pledge to support $4.4 billion in additional border security funds has breathed new life into the bill, but the drumbeat against the legislation shows no signs of quieting.
It’s increasingly clear from Web postings and interviews with top conservative bloggers that the immigration bill has done serious damage to the president’s credibility among the conservative netroots, the grassroots bloggers on the Web.
Erick Erickson, managing editor of the popular conservative blog Redstate, says he receives between 800 and 900 e-mails a day from readers, most of whom are “enraged” by the White House’s immigration efforts.
“Of all the issues the president has picked to make his hill to die on, he has picked the one that has divided his base,” said Erickson, who lives in Macon, Georgia. “I am shocked by the anger and outrage out there … You’ve got war against the president within the Republican party.”
When details of an immigration compromise were announced this spring, conservative bloggers were immediately incensed. Michelle Malkin labeled it “a White House betrayal.”
Another popular blogger, Hugh Hewitt, called the bill a “fiasco” and wrote: “this push for this bill is a disaster, Mr. President.”
No doubt this has the right side up in arms, but not always for the right reasons. You’ll know my position initially was one of “wait and see” until we saw what the bill contained before being for or against.
Being the husband of a Korean immigrant – and now naturalized citizen – I have more than enough sympathy for immigrants so long as they – as my wife did – enter the country legally.
After reading the bill – most of it is legalese that will absolutely make your head explode – I determined that it was indeed not the bill needed to fix the problems we face – not even close. In fact I found it would, if employed, exacerbate the situation immensely.
The fact is that many conservatives like myself have actually read the proposed legislation and have had the same reaction that I and others have had and said, “wait a minute, let’s go back to scratch“. Others have encouraged the President to push on – even sans significant base support – because “it’s the best chance we have now“. Which is the position I initially had until again, I read the thing.
Yet at this point of significant push-back, not only from conservative blogs, but from the American people via polling data, it’s time that the President stop and listen to what the people who elected him twice have to say. Pushing this thing forward is a mistake which may well cost him even more down the road with base support.¬† That is if it’s not already too late.
Capt Ed as quoted:
“I think that they are going to continue to support him on the war on terror. As for the rest of it, they are looking for ways to reshape the party agenda going into the next election. That’s a nice way of saying they are going to consider him irrelevant.”
To take license with a familiar quote: “Mr. President, tear up this bill!“
No Response
retire05
June 18th, 2007 at 1:19 pm
1This bill could be given many labels, one of them “The Employer Behind The Eight Ball Bill” as it requires employers to hire someone BEFORE they can verify a person’s Social Security number for a match, just as the Basic Pilot program does now. It also says that if an employer learns that the person hired is using a stolen or fake SS#, and they fire them, the illegal can then appeal the firing and the employer can be sued by the illegal for discrimination and the legal representation for the illegal will be paid for by the taxpayer. If the employer does not fire the illegal upon learning that the SS# is stolen or fake, the employer is then subject to be prosecuted by the federal government for hiring an illegal.
Wanting to make sure I read the bill correct, I contact Senator Cornyn’s office last Friday (using LaRaza’s dime and their 800-417-7666 number which patches you directly to your Senator’s office). I asked if I was correct on the restrictions it would place on employers who were trying to be honest and verify SS#s. I was told, yes, that is the way the bill reads.
The bill does one thing; it eliminates the catagory of “illegal”. No fines will be charged for the probationary visas, only for the Z (as in Zorro) visa, and only when they apply for citizenship. It would also make moot all the laws passed by individual states dealing with illegal immigration into their state.
I told Cornyn’s office that the Senator needed to find a willing bunch and start all over again. This bill, almost entirely, is unacceptable and the only part of it that will be enforce is the same part of the Simpson-Mazzoli bill; amnesty for millions.
Macranger
June 18th, 2007 at 1:41 pm
2Retire05,
Couldn’t agree more. Like I said reading it sent bells sounding from almost the first page.
clarice
June 19th, 2007 at 7:42 am
3Just a reminder–Bill Clinton’s 1995-6 manipulation of the immigration system for votes.
http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2007/06/flashback_immigration_fraud_an.html
rlqretired
June 19th, 2007 at 7:52 am
4Mac – Thanks for your efforts to get the truth out about the immigration bill. I’m mad enough to get my ball bat and head for Washington. I understand there is a process whereby the Senate Republican Caucus could, if demand required it, re-caucus and kick Lott and McConnell out of their leadership positions and replace them with someone that is willing to fight the President, Democrats and RINO’s. This “clay pigeon” concept McConnell seems to have agreed to makes my blood boil! Does anyone know how this re-call process works and could it be effectively used now to stop this? I called 2 senate offices and could get nothing specific.
stevevvs
June 19th, 2007 at 7:58 am
5The Washington Times has some great articles on this topic today, as well as a great Op-Ed.
RSS feed for comments on this post · TrackBack URI
Leave a reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Top Stories in the Blogosphere News
Microsoft Office 2008 for Mac. Starting at just $149.95 with free shipping.
The Commander in Chief at Work!
News
Reading List
Most Popular Posts
Macsmind – Politics, Culture and Breaking News and the 2012 Presidential Election! Copyright 2008, Macsmind is a registered trademark of Macsmind Media - BloggingPro theme by: Design Disease