If the immigration bill has been killed, then the collateral damage is the coalition between conservatives and other people who are what you might call right-of-center (I do not use the term “conservative” since there seems to be an immigration litmus test that is being imposed).
Don’t believe me? Well, in addition to my vote of no confidence, why not read AJ-Strata’s superb blog¬†(particularly this post), or the stuff at Big Lizards. Or how about the comments from The Anchoress or DJ Drummond?
What we have had is one portion of the Republican coalition loudly tell another portion of the coalition “(Screw) you”.¬† How so? Well, the Chamber of Commerce has immigration reform as a priority. Now, for two consecutive Congresses, they have seen other Republicans align with anti-business Democrats (let’s not kid ourselves about Barbara Boxer and Byron Dorgan – they view business as just another source of wealth to be redistributed as they see fit). They often were willing to go toe-to-toe with the AFL-CIO.¬† Well, now they have been very publicly dissed by those who are purportedly allied with them politically. On an issue they found important. On an issue that they tried to make things work out on.
This sort of thing is not easily forgiven.¬† That goes doubly so with the type of rhetoric that flies on this issue – or with Tom Tancredo’s threatened purge.¬† So now what happens?
Personally, I’m not terribly motivated to do much for the GOP that seems to treat folks like me as second-class Republicans.¬† I certainly have lost confidence in conservatism as well.¬† They have chosen the path of ideological purity – and while it might get those who demand it the leadership they like, it will also mean that all they can do is make brave, valiant, principled stands that inevitably end in one defeat or another.
I’m sick, disgusted, and angry about this.¬† Clearly,¬†some other right-of-center blogs are also upset about this direction that seems to be going on.¬† How many of them will the GOP lose?¬† And will they even try to win us back – or will they too afraid to address our concerns, lest the self-appointed commissars at National Review, Human Events, and on talk radio disapprove?
One thing for sure: In the future, I will only vote for presidential candidates that make their own decisions.¬† If I so much as think that they take polls or run their decisions by National Review or Laura Ingraham, I’ll just find better ways to spend my time.¬† I’ve always wanted to learn how to play golf – and I think it would be far more rewarding to teach my nephew how to pitch or write novels than to keep sticking my neck out for a party that is determined to commit suicide in the name of ideological purity and cannot even seem to be willing to stick up for me against the self-appointed commissars who are free with epithets like “sellout”, “party hack”, “quisling”, and “traitor”.
No Response
psmarc93
June 8th, 2007 at 11:10 am
1As a liberal, I think it’s very sad to see some conservatives now being smeared and ostrasized by their peers for simply having a well-reasoned, opposing idea to their party line. Such name-calling does nothing to engage a useful debate where both sides might learn from the other’s point of view and come to a reasoned compromise that’s good for the nation. My only hope is that these villified conservatives will see that ad-hominem attacks are useless, self-defeating and alienating in the extreme and will extend respect and courtesy to those who disagree with them in the future. I’ve never called anyone with an opposing point-of-view an idiot, a traitor, a kool-aid drinker, a tool — or any such childish taunts — because such name-calling is meaningless. But I have to say, out of the hundreds of times I’ve engaged with discussion with conservatives, I can count on one hand the times I got a polite, respectful — even if heated and passionate — response. I find no satisfaction that some (a majority, I think) of conservatives opposed to the current immigration bill are being call liars and fear-mongers from Bush and much worse from their fellow bloggers and pundits.
If we can agree on one thing, let’s please agree on the need for respectful, reasoned debate. We both owe it to America.
shm10
June 8th, 2007 at 4:58 pm
2Thank you Harold and psmarc.
Well said and a breath of fresh air.
Bobby
June 8th, 2007 at 5:46 pm
3I’m a little confused. Have you wandered into the wrong place? The caption at the top says, “Conservative News, Commentary, and Common Sense.”
Nothing was torn asunder, except the arrogance of those in Congress who think the public is stupid. It’s actually an opportunity. Most people want an orderly immigration program. Most pepole want the border secured, first. This back-room Ted Kennedy driven deal insulted everyone. Common sense approach? No. More like an out of control tractor trailor with a drunk driver.
It would be common sense to ensure that the border was controlled. Do that first. Cut down on terrorists, drug-smugglers, and human traffickers, as well as people looking for work. Then spend the next year formulating a sane policy for inviting people we want into the country. The bill was no beginning. It was a typical “There we fixed it in one package,” fiasco (amnesty) our leaders have been subjecting us to for many years. It’s not worth getting depressed over its defeat. There’s some real work to be done.
Bobby
June 8th, 2007 at 6:04 pm
4Here’s the question Spector, Kennedy, Graham, et. al. (the coalition) should be made to answer:
http://www.wheresthefence.com/offer.asp?Ref_ID=1771
It’s what most people want to know. Last year, just in time for the election, we heard, “We’ll secure the border with a fence.” Then, thinking no one was paying attention, they didn’t fund it. Instead of lamenting their latest fraud, we should be saying, “Restore your credibility; build the fence.”
RSS feed for comments on this post · TrackBack URI
Leave a reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Top Stories in the Blogosphere News
Microsoft Office 2008 for Mac. Starting at just $149.95 with free shipping.
The Commander in Chief at Work!
News
Reading List
Most Popular Posts
Macsmind – Politics, Culture and Breaking News and the 2012 Presidential Election! Copyright 2008, Macsmind is a registered trademark of Macsmind Media - BloggingPro theme by: Design Disease