If the Senate support for the (A) immigration bill was really tight with the 60 votes needed, there would be no need for Ted Kennedy and other supporters to flood the Sunday talk shows.
“Backers of US immigration reform vowed Sunday to hustle deeply divisive legislation through the Senate this week to document 12 million illegal aliens while beefing up border security.
But virulent opponents stepped up attacks on what one critic called a foreign “invasion” of the United States, despite a new bid by President George W. Bush to cement support for the centerpiece of his domestic agenda.After the immigration bill collapsed a fortnight ago, the Senate is set to vote Tuesday on whether to allow debate to proceed on revised legislation that emphasizes tighter borders and law enforcement.
“I believe we will pass the bill, and I think we have good support among the Republican Party,” Democratic Senator Edward Kennedy said on ABC television.
“And the reason we’re going to pass this bill is because it’s tough, fair and practical,” he said.
In his weekly radio address Saturday, Bush revealed that under the revised Senate bill, people slipping into the United States illegally will not only be deported, but never allowed to enter the country again.”
Kennedy and his bravado simply shows that they in fact do not have the votes necessary. Senator Jeff Sessions whom Bush just did some fund raising for just last week doesn’t see the votes being there either.
“Republican Senator Jeff Sessions took issue with Kennedy’s confidence that the latest immigration bill would carry the 60 votes it needs in the 100-seat upper chamber to overcome blocking tactics by its critics.
Top Democrats in the House of Representatives have also warned that Bush must cajole up to 70 Republicans to back the deal in the lower house, as it is likely to be spurned by Democratic lawmakers from conservative districts.
Senate opponents are “going to use every effort to slow this process down and continue to hold up the bill,” Sessions said on ABC.
“It will not work. We will be on the verge of giving an amnesty for 12 million people, but not getting a legal system in the future that will work, and that’s the difficulty there.”
Most observers believe that if the bill fails to make it through Congress this year, it will be dead, as it will get caught up in the political maelstrom of next year’s presidential election.”
We’ll see Tuesday, but Monday opponents of the bill are planning even more ramped up blitzing of Senator’s phones and faxes and emails.
No Response
RJD
June 24th, 2007 at 7:00 pm
1Mac, why no comment on the so-called conservatives who will support surrender to Al-Qaeda if the immagration bill goes forward. Mr. Bilbray, among others, to be exact. Why are you afraid to identify these traitors. So much for your principles. What rationale is next?
Macranger
June 24th, 2007 at 7:22 pm
2Perhaps you would like to elaborate on how “conservatives will support Al Qaeda if the bill goes forward”?
My principles await your response….
Kiss of death for the (A) bill? « Immigration Watch International
June 25th, 2007 at 4:46 pm
3[...] June 26, 2007 at 9:46 am · Filed under Uncategorized Post lifted from Macsmind. See the original for links [...]
RSS feed for comments on this post · TrackBack URI
Leave a reply
Get the Discover® More Card
Microsoft Office 2008 for Mac. Starting at just $149.95 with free shipping.
Tags
2008 Election abortion Acorn Add new tag Bailout Barack Obama Bill Ayers Bush Call to Action Conservatism corrupt democrats Corruption Crime and Punishment democrats economy Election 2008 Election Fraud Eric Holder Financial Crash Financial Crisis Gaffes Gay Marriage GOP Hillary Clinton Immigration Iraq Joe Biden Joe the Plumber John McCain Keith Olbermann Macranger Show media media bias Michelle Obama News Politics Poll Juice polls Sarah Palin site news Tech News terrorism Trooper Gate Troopergate William AyersRecent Comments
Archives
Categories
Blogroll