Byron York on newly released documents related to Valerie Plame’s claim during her appearance earlier this year that she didn’t recommend her husband to the Niger escapade.
“Senator Bond has released the entire text of Mrs. Wilson’s February 12, 2002 memo. In the memo, which was headlined “Iraq-related Nuclear Report Makes a Splash,” she referenced a February 5, 2002 CIA intelligence report about Niger, Iraq, and uranium that had been circulating in the previous week:
The report forwarded below has prompted me to send this on to you and request your comments and opinion. Briefly, it seems that Niger has signed a contract with Iraq to sell them uranium. The IC [Intelligence Community] is getting spun up about this for obvious reasons. The embassy in Niamey has taken the position that this report can’t be true ‚Äî they have such cozy relations with the GON [Government of Niger] that they would know if something like this transpired.
So where do I fit in? As you may recall, [redacted] of CP/[office 2] recently approached my husband to possibly use his contacts in Niger to investigate [a separate Niger matter]. After many fits and starts, [redacted] finally advised that the station wished to pursue this with liaison. My husband is willing to help, if it makes sense, but no problem if not. End of story.
Now, with this report, it is clear that the IC is still wondering what is going on‚Ķ my husband has good relations with both the PM and the former minister of mines, not to mention lots of French contacts, both of whom could possibly shed light on this sort of activity. To be frank with you, I was somewhat embarrassed by the agency’s sloppy work last go-round, and I am hesitant to suggest anything again. However, [my husband] may be in a position to assist. Therefore, request your thoughts on what, if anything, to pursue here. Thank you for your time on this.
The memo seems to show that Mrs. Wilson did indeed suggest her husband for the Niger mission. And it sheds new light on why Mrs. Wilson was involved in the Niger uranium matter to begin with. The conventional wisdom has always been that she suggested her husband’s name in response to an inquiry from Vice President Dick Cheney about the Iraq Niger uranium story. But her memo, written on February 12, seems to show that she suggested her husband’s name before the vice president asked his question on February 13. “
Senator Bond was visibly annoyed by Plame’s testimony in March as it bordered on perjury - if not completely crossing the line. Perhaps a reapperance in light of the conflicting testimony is in order to “clarify” the record.
No Response
ordi
May 25th, 2007 at 12:20 pm
1Byron York also posted 3 other posts that do more Fact-Checking of Valerie Plame.
Fact-Checking Valerie Plame Wilson, Pt. 2
Fact-Checking Valerie Plame Wilson, Pt. 3
Fact-Checking Valerie Plame Wilson, Pt. 4
Dc
May 25th, 2007 at 12:44 pm
2Thanks Mac as always.
It seems there may be another missed point in the detail of this memo: …”my husband is willing to help….”
That line seems to suggest that she had already spoken to her husband as well and he had already agreed that he would help if it they wanted to use him.
So, it would seem that Joe had “preauthorized” his use in his wifes “boondoggle”. I won’t even mention her discussing classified national intelligence with her husband.
clarice
May 25th, 2007 at 3:37 pm
3I think this is the most important part of the memo:”So where do I fit in? As you may recall, [redacted] of CP/[office 2] recently approached my husband to possibly use his contacts in Niger to investigate [a separate Niger matter]. After many fits and starts, [redacted] finally advised that the station wished to pursue this with liaison. My husband is willing to help, if it makes sense, but no problem if not. End of story.”
That would have been three times in two years she pushed him for work in Niger by my count. She freely admitted the first treip(I believe in 2001).
Dc
May 25th, 2007 at 9:28 pm
4Thanks Clarice. Astute and attentive as always.
…getting paid to watch » Val Plame’s unfortunate paper trail
May 26th, 2007 at 7:34 am
5[...] Hat tip to Mac Ranger. [...]
Hot Air » Blog Archive » Fact-checking Plame
May 26th, 2007 at 7:31 pm
6[...] Which, among other things, means that she may have committed the same crime for which Scooter Libby is currently on trial. Only, if it turns out that she committed perjury, her crime led to the investigation that led to the Libby trial. [...]
RSS feed for comments on this post · TrackBack URI
Leave a reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Get the Discover® More Card
Microsoft Office 2008 for Mac. Starting at just $149.95 with free shipping.
Tags
2008 Election abortion Acorn Add new tag Bailout Barack Obama Bill Ayers Blagojevich Bush Chris Dodd Colin Powell Conservatism corrupt democrats Corruption democrats economy Election 2008 Election Fraud Elections Financial Crisis Gay Marriage George Tiller GOP Hillary Clinton Iraq Israel Joe Biden Joe the Plumber John McCain Liberals Macranger Show media media bias Michelle Obama News Politics Poll Juice polls Rahm Emanuel Rev. Wright Rick Warren Rod Blagojevich Sarah Palin Tech News terrorismRecent Comments
Archives
Categories
Blogroll
Macsmind Copyright 2008, Macsmind is a registered trademark of Macsmind Media - BloggingPro theme by: Design Disease