Having slept in today after our late night liveblogging and round table at Heading Right, and re-listening to the debate, I have just a few thoughts.
One, my pick Romney needs to show some movement in the polls, specifically in SC where he trails Fred Thompson who hasn’t even thrown his hat into the ring. By the way, Fred needs to announce within the next week or so or it may be too late. If he does it changes EVERYTHING.
The event of the night is of course was Ron Paul’s dumbassed remarks on 9/11, where he blamed US (the Jews), for the attack, which sparked Rudy Guilliani to demand an on-air retraction, which he didn’t get.
Paul issued every talking point nearly verbatum from the left wing blogsphere who is his main supporter.
Hot Air has the video here. Yet for all the sparks, we finally heard Rudy say, “I’m pro-choice get over it”, to which I believe pretty much is the death nail for his candidacy. I know that others disagree that abortion isn’t the issue it once was that Rudy has other redeeming qualities, but the fact is that he is a die-in-the-wool RINO and we’re had enough of RINOs.
With that said, goodbye already to RINO extrordinare John McCain. He did better in the debate last night - wasn’t as angry - but as I’ve said his time is past. He’s a relict of 2000 and frankly I’m tired of looking at him. Besides, “Gang of 13 anyone?” He really lost me when he tried to tell us that he never supported amnesty on illegal immigration. Come on John!
Like it or not Tancredo is a one issue candidate - Ok, maybe two if you lump immigration with Iraq like he did. But beyond that the guy’s timing was off and if he is to have any chance - he doesn’t but playing the devil here - he needs to work on getting his message concise and to the point.
Brownback was solid on abortion and in an off air interview on Fox after the debate said that how one views the subject says alot about their character (Rudy?).
Not much else from other cadidates really caught my attention, except for Thompson who looked like a mannequin. Again, appearances as just as important as substance and Thompson basically kicked his candidacy to the curb last night, with or without a “blog”.
Overall, I would have to say - because Paul served up an asswipe statement over homeplate and Rudy drove it over the fence that he won the night. But at what cost? By finally spelling out what we’ve all known, Guilliani is a pro-choice, antigun RINO, as far as I’m concerned the cost was his chance at President.
No Response
Harold C. Hutchison
May 16th, 2007 at 8:50 am
1Romney’s done well, and he is my choice, but I think that after the way Giuliani smacked down Ron Paul, Rudy is probably going to be the nominee.
fred
May 16th, 2007 at 8:54 am
2I didn’t see the entire debate, but there is an interesting video report of it here: http://www.thenewsroom.com/details/307062/Politics
kathie
May 16th, 2007 at 12:00 pm
3I’m think McCain is a has been, campaign finance (Soros went straight to the bank), the 13 thing, voted no on tax cuts, no on extraordinary questioning (with an imminent attack, holy cow! loose a city to preserve a reputation with the terrorists, as if they care about reputation. Is it totally sanctimonious, amongst other character traits.
RSS feed for comments on this post · TrackBack URI
Leave a reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Get the Discover® More Card
Microsoft Office 2008 for Mac. Starting at just $149.95 with free shipping.
Tags
2008 Election abortion Acorn Add new tag Bailout Barack Obama Bill Ayers Blagojevich Bush Chris Dodd Colin Powell Conservatism corrupt democrats Corruption democrats economy Election 2008 Election Fraud Elections Financial Crisis Gay Marriage George Tiller GOP Hillary Clinton Iraq Israel Joe Biden Joe the Plumber John McCain Liberals Macranger Show media media bias Michelle Obama News Politics Poll Juice polls Rahm Emanuel Rev. Wright Rick Warren Rod Blagojevich Sarah Palin Tech News terrorismRecent Comments
Archives
Categories
Blogroll