When is a protest against the US in Iraq irrelevant? When it’s organized by a thug we should have taken out to the trash two years ago:

“BAGHDAD, April 9 ‚Äî Tens of thousands of protesters loyal to Moktada al-Sadr, the Shiite cleric, took to the streets of the holy city of Najaf on Monday in an extraordinarily disciplined rally to demand an end to the American military presence in Iraq, burning American flags and chanting ‚ÄúDeath to America!‚Äù

Residents said that the angry, boisterous demonstration was the largest in Najaf, the heart of Shiite religious power, since the American-led invasion in 2003. It took place on the fourth anniversary of the fall of Baghdad, and it was an obvious effort by Mr. Sadr to show the extent of his influence here in Iraq, even though he did not appear at the rally. Mr. Sadr went underground after the American military began a new security push in Baghdad on Feb. 14, and his whereabouts are unknown.

Mr. Sadr used the protest to try to reassert his image as a nationalist rebel who appeals to both anti-American Shiites and Sunni Arabs. He established that reputation in 2004, when he publicly supported Sunni insurgents in Falluja who were battling United States marines, and quickly gained popularity among Sunnis across Iraq and the region. But his nationalist credentials have been tarnished in the last year, as Sunni Arabs have accused Mr. Sadr‚Äôs militia, the Mahdi Army, of torturing and killing Sunnis.”

This is the price you pay for appeasment. There is no way Sadr should be breathing right now much less organizing protests. He is a murderous thug, an animal and a rabid animal at that. The only way to deal with a rabid animal is to put him out of our misery.

For those who think that this would incite rebellion and violence, let me say if this would have been done in the beginning of the occupation Sadr would have been another footnote in the story of Iraq’s democracy. As it stands now, he may become the entire story.