13 Apr
Posted by MacRanger as democrats, media gaffs
Ok, folks, here is the gist:
As you know Democrats are in an uproar over eight US attorneys being fired for what they say is political purposes, when it’s apparent that all of them had at least a few performance related issues.
Now we have liberal king of talk radio Don Imus getting the boot, and CBS and MSNBC are saying it’s for performance (one very thoughtless and wrong sentence), when in fact we know it is becoming apparent that it was political pressure.
Note this from Rich Lowry at NRO
“Don Imus has to wonder where all his friends went. Just yesterday, his radio/TV show was the favorite venue of the journalistic and political elite, who delighted ‚Äî or pretended to delight ‚Äî in his ribald comments. Today, most of them appear shocked that Imus was ever given a show.
The unedifying Imus controversy is almost entirely a liberal conflagration, a perfect bonfire of the profanities: with journalists and politicians caught out ignoring their own standards of political correctness; with left-wing grievance-meisters doing their grim work on the mainstream media’s favorite shock jock; with the culture of victimology running its ritualistic course. Armed only with the dubious loyalty of his frequent guests, Imus didn’t stand a chance.Calling the Rutgers’s women’s basketball team “nappy-headed hos,” as Imus did, was, of course, appalling. But you have to feel a twinge of sympathy for him, given the suddenness with which rules that had never applied to him suddenly were brought down around his head. Perhaps if his corporate masters at MSNBC and CBS Radio had told him long ago that he shouldn’t gratuitously insult people on the basis of their appearance, race, or gender, he never would have made the comment in the first place.
But Imus brought buzzy programming to MSNBC every morning and millions of dollars to CBS, so it was offensiveness in a worthy cause (i.e., $). The talent at NBC and liberal journalists from every other outlet in the country were happy to chuckle along.
Impeccably liberal columnist Tom Oliphant had the misfortune to appear on Imus’s show after the “nappy-headed” comment and before it was clear that Imus was on his way to being expelled from polite company. Oliphant excused the Imus remark as something that “can happen to anybody,” and ended his appearance by saying that regular guests “have a moral obligation to stand up and say to you, ‘Solidarity forever, pal.’”
So there you have it: Offensiveness now, offensiveness tomorrow, offensiveness forever. No liberal would make that kind of stand on behalf of anyone else. Imus got an exemption because his guests could feel as though they were part of the in-crowd and that they had done something wild and naughty by parleying with him.”
Rich notes the other media elites that “pimped themselves” on the show to get that all important face time. After all when you consider that many of them worked for newspapers, magazines and TV shows that have been hemoraging readers/viewers, they needed it. I’ve got a feeling that a lot of former guest are more than a little nervous as over eleven years many of them have most likely shared more than they should have, thus Imus no doubt has a treasure trove of notable quotes.
Again, the fact that the show made CBS/MSNBC a combined $50 million ought to have inquiring minds asking, “What really happened”. I’m convinced that Chuck Shumer’s March 10th appearance where Imus nuked him and thoroughly embarrassed him about his hypocrisy over the Walter Reed Scandal was the beginning of the end.
It’s worth a look again.
You knew the writing was on the wall for Imus when Viacom’s Sumner Redstone said that he knew Moonves would “Do the right thing”. Since Redstone is a heavy backer of Democrats and a friend of Schumer, the “right thing” meant to can Imus.
So here is the $50 million dollar question. Was Imus let go for political reasons, to placate Democrats and woo them to hosting all their appearences and debates exclusively on their networks? If so I think they should “do the right thing” and say it. They should come out and say (what we already know), that they kowtow to the Democratic Party, and they will do anything, including eating their own.
UPDATE: Hot Air with a slew of other reacts.
No Response
habanero
April 13th, 2007 at 8:42 am
1Sorry Mac, this has Hillary Clinton all over it.
Open your Clinton playbook to 1995, the last time a Clinton faced the possibility of having to go head to head with a black man. That would be Collin Powel when he was considering the run for president, and the poles showed he would kick Clinton’s ass up between his ears.
The first thing the Clinton’s did was use the OJ trial to divide black and white. Then they got screwy Louie Farakan to come up with a Million Man March to further divide the races and create fear in the (liberal) white community. After the verdict in the OJ trial the Clinton’s had their minions calling c-span, talk radio, and everwhere else they could think of with the same talking point: “The verdict shows that when a black has to choose between doing what is right and BLACK, the black will always choose black.”
As it stands now, it’s a “BLACK” man that wants to shut down free speech. How are the Hollywood left going to support someone that want’s to shut down their free speech?
owl
April 13th, 2007 at 8:54 am
2I think you hit it dead center. This transcript should be up and required reading/watching for all Repubs because it is the perfect example of why Imus was fired.
“Have you ever been to Walter Reed hospital?”
Imus gives Schumer full time to explain his position and his newest ’scandal’ and then comes back with….
“Did you vote to authorize the president to go to war in Iraq?” So why would you–if you voted for the president to go to war in Iraq–why wouldn’t you go over to Walter Reed?”
He comes back. He was the only loose cannon at NBC/MSNBC. They were the main 24/7 Democrat cooker until last year when ABC took over. Look at the patterns. You can trace everything the Dems are doing and all their newest ’scandals’ there. I watched them and could tell you almost before they got their talking points from DNC, what the newest would be.
The Dems are building firewalls right now and Imus had to be taken out. He walked right in, but he should have known it was coming closer every day. He can’t stand Hillary.
I disagree with almost every view Imus has and Hate his potty mouth that goes over the line. He calls my VP a war criminal and my President a moron. I hate that. He hates the war. This is My War. He should have kept his potty mouth shut when it came to insulting young women. Regardless of their color.
But this is not what canned him. He has guts enough to ask REAL QUESTIONS. From anyone, on any subject. The Democrat MSM Army does not do this…….ever. Ever. So for all the Repubs that are cheering, I say again, someone is going to have to get into the mud to fight this one. They are building firewalls and they are coming. I have never been a real big Clinton basher, but he got re-elected on the back of OK City because he shut down that ‘hate speech’ on talk radio. Get it yet?
A few mornings ago, Paul Begala came on Imus to show support. They agreed Imus was over the line and bad wrong but then Begala had to go farther. The conversation went something like this….
Begala says he should have done an intervention with Imus a good while back….he repeats this a couple of times….so then Imus comes back at him asking if that is like Paul never knew about all those women Clinton was messing with? That he was shocked?
In the midst of all that I hated on Imus, you tell me another Dem MSM that will call them on their pure crap? An intervention? I just hope he knows who really got him.
kathie
April 13th, 2007 at 9:13 am
3I think that Imus will have more to say, and it may not be pretty for some of the favored dems. He will get another radio show.
owl
April 13th, 2007 at 9:46 am
4One other question that I have been asking since the Democrat 2004 convention…..
I keep asking this same question because I am verrrrry confused. I thought it was Hillary running her VP candidate because he had The Voice. That way she insures victory. A lock.
I have NEVER seen such as this happen before. Big money from somewhere. No way a junior senator can do this. So who put up the big money in 2004???
Soros? Anyone know? Does not matter….everyone better pay attention to The Voice and quit discounting it as inexperienced. I do not want Obama as President and we need to concentrate on who can beat them. Obama and Hill are working as a duo to knock out the Republicans (and Imus/FOX). Money….money….who spent the money from 2004 to run The Voice?
crosspatch
April 13th, 2007 at 10:18 am
5It is all smoke from Media Matters (A Soros group) to get attention off of the Duke/Nifong thing and push that story off the newscasts. It is smoke. Notice how the Nifong story was dropped by the MSM as soon as this came out.
Literally within minutes of Imus having said this, Media Matters had notified hundreds of journalists around the country of it.
Squiggler
April 13th, 2007 at 2:34 pm
6From the Wall Street Journal:
SOROS OPERATION TAKES CREDIT FOR TALK HOST TAKE-DOWN…
RSS feed for comments on this post · TrackBack URI
Leave a reply
Get the Discover® More Card
Microsoft Office 2008 for Mac. Starting at just $149.95 with free shipping.
Tags
2008 Election abortion Acorn Add new tag Bailout Barack Obama Bill Ayers Bush Call to Action Conservatism corrupt democrats Corruption Crime and Punishment democrats economy Election 2008 Election Fraud Eric Holder Financial Crash Financial Crisis Gaffes Gay Marriage GOP Hillary Clinton Immigration Iraq Joe Biden Joe the Plumber John McCain Keith Olbermann Macranger Show media media bias Michelle Obama News Politics Poll Juice polls Sarah Palin site news Tech News terrorism Trooper Gate Troopergate William AyersRecent Comments
Archives
Categories
Blogroll
Macsmind Copyright 2008, Macsmind is a registered trademark of Macsmind Media - BloggingPro theme by: Design Disease