While libs go gaga over the revelation that the White House used email accounts other than the “official ones”, the fact is that there’s a little hypocrisy going on here. First the story:
“WASHINGTON – The White House said Wednesday it had mishandled Republican Party-sponsored e-mail accounts used by nearly two dozen presidential aides, resulting in the loss of an undetermined number of e-mails concerning official White House business.
Congressional investigators looking into the administration’s firing of eight federal prosecutors already had the nongovernmental e-mail accounts in their sights because some White House aides used them to help plan the U.S. attorneys’ ouster. Democrats were questioning whether the use of the GOP-provided e-mail accounts was proof that the firings were political.
Democrats also have been asking if White House officials are purposely conducting sensitive official presidential business via nongovernmental accounts to get around a law requiring preservation – and eventual disclosure – of presidential records. The announcement of the lost e-mails – a rare admission of error from the Bush White House at a delicate time for the administration’s relations with Democratically controlled Capitol Hill – gave new fodder for inquiry on this front.
“This sounds like the administration’s version of the dog ate my homework,” said Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Patrick Leahy, D-Vt. “I am deeply disturbed that just when this administration is finally subjected to meaningful oversight, it cannot produce the necessary information.”
The Republican National Committee set up the accounts for about 20 Bush aides, such as Karl Rove and his deputies, who get involved in politics, spokesman Scott Stanzel said. Having the GOP create non-White House addresses and provide separate BlackBerries, laptops and other communications gear was designed to avoid running afoul of Hatch Act rules barring federal employees from engaging in political activities with government resources or on government time, he said.”
Why am I NOT suprised that AP’s Chief Bush Basher Jennifer Loven is writing this story
……I digress.
The fact is that according to some who know, witch hunters such as Leahy, Schumer, Conyers and others democrats also use DNC email accounts quite frequently, in some cases for official business.
Hell, I even have one.
Still, there is NO indication that anyone was trying to hide anything. This is just another example of how Democrats apply the burden of proof. If it came from Bush, it’s got to be criminal.
The White House response is both reasonable and plausible.
“This is entirely appropriate,” Stanzel said of the Bush White House practice.
He said staffers used their RNC accounts instead of White House accounts to discuss the prosecutor issue or conduct other official business for several reasons, including extra caution about complying with the Hatch Act as well as the convenience of using one account instead of several. Stanzel said he could not speak to whether anyone was intentionally trying to avoid White House archiving because he had not spoken to all those involved.
Stanzel said some e-mails have been lost because the White House lacked clear policies on complying with Presidential Records Act requirements.
Before 2004, for instance, e-mails to and from the accounts were typically automatically deleted every 30 days along with all other RNC e-mails. Even though that was changed in 2004, so that the White House staffers with those accounts were excluded from the RNC’s automatic deletion policy, some of their e-mails were lost anyway when individual aides deleted their own files, Stanzel said.”
Hell, it’s not like they lost 100 FBI files or anything like that.
No Response
shield
April 12th, 2007 at 7:38 am
1YouTube Jewish Coalition spot against old Nan’s meeting with Assad
habanero
April 12th, 2007 at 8:01 am
2The FBI files Craig Livingston got were nothing more than a cover story, meaning if anyone asked about FBI files this is what would be responded to. There are different FBI files.
In 1991 after the R King beating Bush 41 ordered a review of all complaints filed against police with the FBI. After the 92 LA riots the FBI released a report claiming there was nothing in the files. In late May early June 92 Bush ordered all the US Attorneys to review the complaints.
As you might recall during the 92 election the Dems kept calling on Bush to release the contents of the files, and the dems made the claim that Bush wouldn’t release the files because it would prove Rep. racism was the reason police were not being held accountable.
When Reno was nominated as AG she said the first thing she would do if she was confirmed as AG was to release the contents of the files. She never released the content of the files, she fired all the
US A’s instead.
In early 98 G Stephanopolis(?)said on “This Week” that Hillary had a plan to release FBI files, everyone automatically assumed he was talking about the FBI files C Livingston got, he wasn’t. He was talking about the FBI files Reno had fired the US A’s to cover-up.
jay k.
April 12th, 2007 at 11:01 am
3there you go again…
Stanzel said “…some e-mails have been lost because the White House lacked clear policies on complying with Presidential Records Act requirements.”
but the handbook given to all staffers says “…federal law requires the preservation of electronic communications sent or received by White House staff…”
now that seems like a crystal f’ing clear policy…unless you are simply intent on defending this administration no matter what they do.
JAW
April 12th, 2007 at 12:10 pm
4Come on Jay,
That is ridiculous to say that Mac will defend Bush no matter what! I mean he posted the White House response, Case closed. And didn’t you read about that completely unrelated supposed scandel by Clinton? If that doesn’t end this silliness, I don’t know what will. Now just look the other way while the administration continues to break federal law, such as the Presidential Records Act
Mike
April 12th, 2007 at 5:08 pm
5Who CARES?
Where’s DA Law that was Broken?
“Much Ado bout Nuttin!”
habanero
April 12th, 2007 at 8:27 pm
6I wouldn’t worry about those e-mails, they’re being kept with the Rose Law Firm billing records. Just send Hillary over to get them, she’ll know where they are.
jonnieg
April 14th, 2007 at 10:02 am
7“Where‚Äôs DA Law that was Broken?”
From the article above:
“Stanzel said some e-mails have been lost because the White House lacked clear policies on complying with Presidential Records Act requirements.”
In other words, you’re holding the presidency to lower standards than a stock broker:
[http://www.mirapoint.com/pdfs/articles/CVarticle-ZeroTolerance.pdf]
- All emails must be preserved for up to seven years, and in an easily accessible place
for the first two years
- When emails are requested by the regulatory bodies, the stated retrieval time is
“immediate” (which in practice is typically 24 hours, say the experts)
hastingspete
April 14th, 2007 at 10:26 pm
8Another absurd Macsmind post. You don’t have to stretch hard to say that the law is being broken here. In direct contravention of the law that required that records be maintained in the White house, they deliberately used outside email accounts, in some cases for 95% of their political business. Then, not surprisingly at all for this unbelievable band of prevaricators, up to five MILLION emails may have gone missing. FIVE MILLION. Seriously.
And you bring up CLINTON again? You have got to be kidding. Travelgate? That’s the best you can do? You would have rightfully stroked if Clinton’s White House ran some ridiculous percent of their emails externally, and then, umm, lost them. Just knock the pathetic charges of hyperventilated hypocrisy alone. That is the refuge of pathetic cowards. Face the simple facts here, and stop saying “The Democrats did something remotely similar to this once, and they’re not being held accountable”. Pathetic. There’s a scandal a week coming out of this absolute band of criminals in the White House and you’re pointing to Travelgate? You have got to be out of your collective minds. What does this White House have to do before you have a single bad word to say about them? What happened to your collective claims that Republicans will bring accountability back? What nonsense! They, and you, are the biggest bunch of whining, unaccountable, criminal babies on the planet. Take some responsibility for this Administration, or spend the next twenty years wandering the wilderness.
Aren’t you even slightly embarassed by these shennigans?
RSS feed for comments on this post · TrackBack URI
Leave a reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Get the Discover® More Card
Microsoft Office 2008 for Mac. Starting at just $149.95 with free shipping.
Meta
Macsmind – Home of the MacRanger Show Copyright 2008, Macsmind is a registered trademark of Macsmind Media - BloggingPro theme by: Design Disease