Nancy Pelosi Should Resign
The calls for Speaker Nancy Pelosi to step down are growing and in the coming week you will see even more calls from both sides of the isle.
Jerry Zeifam who served as Democratic Counsel of the House Judiciary for 17 years, writes
“Nancy Pelosi has persistently violated her duty to exercise her speakerpowers in accordance with the Constitution and the current “106thCongress House Rules Manual” (House Document 106-320).In short, she has fostered what is known as “tyranny by the majority” ‚Äîand violated House Rules that give her the duty to maintain order,civility, and decorum, and to foster “comity” (a word rarely used thesedays, meaning “mutual respect”).
The “House Rules Manual” includes Jefferson’s “Manual of ParliamentaryProcedures,” originally drafted by the founder of the Democratic Partywhen, as vice president, he presided over the Senate from 1797 to 1801.
In 1837 the House, provided that the provisions of Jefferson’s Manualshould “govern the House in all cases to which they are applicable andin which they are not inconsistent with [subsequently adopted rules].”
Jefferson’s manual, which is still in effect, was a codification of18th century “common law” and re-affirms that House Rules are “the onlyweapons by which the minority can defend itself . . . and by a strictadherence to which the weaker party can only be protected from thoseirregularities and abuses which these forms were intended to check, andwhich the wantonness of power is but too often apt to suggest to largeand successful majorities.”
Currently, Pelosi, who is second in line to the president, oftendescribes herself as a partner in his power ‚Äî a higher role than theConstitution grants to the vice president, who is first in the line ofsecession ‚Äî and whose only official duties are confined to presidingover the Senate.”
As I called for yesterday, Speaker Pelosi has no choice now but to resign or be removed from office by Congress. She cannot undo the damage at this point. Already she has been called to account by every major news organization and now even members of her own party.
Zeifman continues using the example of former Speaker Jim Wright:
“As described 10 years later by Wright’s own chief of staff: “[Then]Republican Minority Whip Trent Lott described Wright’s participation inforeign affairs as “The most arrogant abuse of power I’ve ever seen . .. Dick Cheney of Illinois, [then] chairman of the Republican PolicyCommittee, got so mad at Jim Wright that he began to wax nostalgicabout the warmth and affection for the previous speaker, Tip O’Neill.‚ÄòThere are no such feelings for Jim Wright,’ he observed.” Then-HouseMinority Leader Newt Gingrich began filing numerous accusations ofmalfeasance by the speaker in the House Ethics Committee.¬† In the end Jim Wright resigned.
With the unanimous endorsement of the Democratic caucus the House thenvoted to replace him with Democrat Tom Foley ‚Äî who restored thetraditional civility and comity that had prevailed under DemocraticSpeakers Sam Rayburn, John McCormack, Carl Albert and “Tip” O’Neill.
Currently, with public respect for professional politicians at an alltime low, and the financing of presidential campaigns at an all timehigh, the moral authority of both the Democratic Party and the GOP isdiminishing. In my view, the longer Nancy Pelosi remains our party’sleading spokesperson the more her penchant for political warfare andnon-compliance with Jefferson’s “Manual” will enhance the chances ofRepublican control of Congress and/or the White House in 2008.
She will serve our party and the nation best by resigning.”
We will continue the call for Pelosi to resign until she does the right and proper thing and steps down.
No Response
crosspatch
April 7th, 2007 at 12:29 pm
1The goal of the Democrats is obviously to destroy the United States of America. They need to go … at every level of government. I came to that conclusion when pondering the question of why they would destroy the credibility of their country on the world stage. It is because the destruction of their country is actually their ultimate goal. Why else would they obstruct a war against people who have vowed to destroy us if it takes centuries and who are against every single value modern American liberalism stands for?
These people are against women’s rights. Against rights for people of different sexual orientation. Against freedom of to include freedom to choose no religion. They are against the notion of secular government and people choosing their own leaders.
The Islamists would find it quite acceptable to execute a woman who fought off a rapist while traveling without a male escort … if her family didn’t burn her alive first for “dishonoring” them. And yet the Democrats would defend these people against us?
These are people that have officially stated that it is perfectly acceptable to kill Americans of any occupation, even children and have done so by the thousands. And the Democrats defend them.
The Democrats are just plain evil and are out to destroy our country. They so hate America being powerful that they are out to realize their goal of the 1960’s of neutering America. There would be nobody to stand up against these kinds of people in the Democrat’s world vision. The world would be mayhem. Survival of the fittest … and they are determined that America won’t be the fittest.
I don’t know who appointed America to be the world’s policeman … but there needs to be one. And it is better us than some islamo-fascist Caliph.
Cornhusker
April 7th, 2007 at 5:23 pm
2This is hopeful news, Mac! I am doing my part.
kathie
April 7th, 2007 at 8:42 pm
3People who are born in America, instead of say India, Russia, China or some where else, have a special obligation in this world, because it was not an accident.
shield
April 8th, 2007 at 10:52 am
4I don’t know who appointed America to be the world’s policeman
I’d say ‘Our Creator’ of this whole universe. That’s actually why we are so hated. As Jesus said in the gospels…If they hate you…you know they hated me first. It’s actually that simple.
Joh 15:18 If the world hate you, ye know that it hated me before it hated you.
Joh 7:7 The world cannot hate you; but me it hateth, because I testify of it, that the works thereof are evil.
Luk 21:17 And ye shall be hated of all men for my name’s sake.
And that’s because:
2Co 4:4 In whom the god of this world hath blinded the minds of them which believe not, lest the light of the glorious gospel of Christ, who is the image of God, should shine unto them.
Pro 3:7 Be not wise in thine own eyes: fear the LORD, and depart from evil.
shield
April 8th, 2007 at 10:57 am
5Get a unique perspective on today’s issues with the political cartoons of IBD’s Pulitzer Prize Winner, Michael Ramirez. NANCY…the submission idiot…
mendolaf
May 7th, 2007 at 12:04 am
6nancy pelosi needs to be recalled if cal has the ball she is in bed with bad guys. she will sell our country out!
RSS feed for comments on this post · TrackBack URI
Leave a reply
Get the Discover® More Card
Microsoft Office 2008 for Mac. Starting at just $149.95 with free shipping.
Tags
2008 Election abortion Acorn Add new tag Bailout Barack Obama Bill Ayers Bush Call to Action Conservatism corrupt democrats Corruption Crime and Punishment democrats economy Election 2008 Election Fraud Eric Holder Financial Crash Financial Crisis Gaffes Gay Marriage GOP Hillary Clinton Immigration Iraq Joe Biden Joe the Plumber John McCain Keith Olbermann Macranger Show media media bias Michelle Obama News Politics Poll Juice polls Sarah Palin site news Tech News terrorism Trooper Gate Troopergate William AyersRecent Comments
Archives
Categories
Blogroll
Macsmind Copyright 2008, Macsmind is a registered trademark of Macsmind Media - BloggingPro theme by: Design Disease