Recent information I’ve received leads me to believe that the reason Democrats want the head of Gonzales on a platter has nothing to do with the US attorney’s departures, but possibly because the results of several on-going investigations are about to have devastating implications for them.

Details are murky, and I’m not just throwing this out there (the source is solid), but it’s explains why such a big deal is being made out of nothing.

Intriguing considering this list of “Nay” votes at his confirmation hearing:

Akaka (D-HI)
Bayh (D-IN)
Biden (D-DE)
Bingaman (D-NM)
Boxer (D-CA)
Byrd (D-WV)
Cantwell (D-WA)
Carper (D-DE)
Clinton (D-NY)
Corzine (D-NJ)
Dayton (D-MN)
Dodd (D-CT)
Dorgan (D-ND)
Durbin (D-IL)
Feingold (D-WI)
Feinstein (D-CA)
Harkin (D-IA)
Jeffords (I-VT)
Johnson (D-SD)
Kennedy (D-MA)
Kerry (D-MA)
Kohl (D-WI)
Lautenberg (D-NJ)
Leahy (D-VT)
Levin (D-MI)
Lincoln (D-AR)
Mikulski (D-MD)
Murray (D-WA)
Obama (D-IL)
Reed (D-RI)
Reid (D-NV)
Rockefeller (D-WV)
Sarbanes (D-MD)
Schumer (D-NY)
Stabenow (D-MI)
Wyden (D-OR)

Readers of this blog should note the more familiar names, two of which were suspected of leaking classified info resulting in a probe in 2005.

Additionally, it also explains the MSM harping on the story as Gonzales also threatened to prosecute media types as well for the leaks.

It’s beginning to make sense.

More to come…..