08 Mar
Posted by MacRanger as Uncategorized
Received an email with the following claims, checking them, so not at this time fully verified but here we go:
Much ado is being made about so-called “pressured” calls from republican lawmakers to some of the fired US attorneys, yet it’s been discovered that the very same thing took place on a reqular basis to the office of fired US Attorney Carol Lam’s office during the investigation of former Rep. Randy “Duke” Cunningham.
Many of the calls were referenced to “progress” and the “necessity” of “getting to the truth” . According to the email Former Lam office insiders say that calls were made both by the offices (or someone identifying themselves to be) of Senator Dianne Feinstein, and Senator Barbara Boxer, and inquired of updates and asked questions specific to resolution of the case which essentially wrapped up with Cunningham pleading out and accepting his fate. Whether or not they actually received any assistance isn’t known.
Again, I can’t verify, but I did speak with a local prosecutor today who told me that they routinely receive calls from politicians – more specifically their office – with inquiry into ongoing investigations.
Interesting to note that Feinstein was so appreciative of the quick resolution of Cunningham’s case that upon Lam’s departure she glowingly “rewarded” her for a job well done.
One might also wonder how the media so quickly knew about the FBI raid on Dusty Foggo almost while they still there.
Not that any of this makes a hill of beans on the so-called dumped prosecutor ‘scandal’. Again, it doesn’t matter if Gonzales didn’t like the length of Lam’s hair. A prosecutor can be fired for anything reason or no reason at all. But it would prove essentially interesting if this pans out. One early story I got via phone call with someone close to this story was that some of the firings had to do with the Prosecutors involved purposely leaking investigative progress to Democrats and the media – specifically in the leadup to the midterms – and that might have had a direct bearing on the dismissals.
As they say….Developing
No Response
clarice
March 12th, 2007 at 8:52 am
1Two good articles on this issue:One in the Spectator, one in the WSJ. If Gonzales had simply said he was replacing these guys because they were tired and he wanted fresh blood–it would have been the end of the story. But Deputy McNulty made this into a performance issues and set off a firestorm with Schumer calling for Gonzales to be fired.
If Gonzales is fired, McNulty who is close to Schumer, Comey and Fitzgerald will be acting AG and Schumer will hold up confirmation of anyone else.
Macranger
March 12th, 2007 at 12:01 pm
2As bad as it looks, Gonzales isn’t going anything, at least not as far as the President is concerned. McNulty however might be gone before week’s end.
No matter how it was handled, no one should lose their jobs over rotten PR, and addtionally there is more I believe to the story about these nine so-called flawless prosecutors. Digging on that now.
RSS feed for comments on this post · TrackBack URI
Leave a reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Top Stories in the Blogosphere News
Microsoft Office 2008 for Mac. Starting at just $149.95 with free shipping.
The Commander in Chief at Work!
News
Reading List
Most Popular Posts