Clarice Feldman has done some digging and found that today’s democrats have “Selective Amnesia“:

“A common media trick to get editorial opinion into apparent news stories is the use of outside “scholars” to argue the writer’s point for him. So, I was not astonished to read this about the Gonzales kerfuffle in the St Louis Post- Dispatch:
Several former U.S. attorneys and legal scholars say the timing of the Bush administration’s replacement of top federal prosecutors is not only atypical, but also a threat to the impartial exercise of justice.

“The sanctity of that position, in terms of that position being immune from any kind of pressure from the administration or Congress, has been the hallmark of the U.S. attorney process. It’s been the hallmark of the federal system of justice,” said W. Charles Grace, a former U.S. attorney for Illinois’ southern district.

The article doesn’t say which administration Mr. Grace served in .This is not surprising . When using this trick to squeeze opinion in a news story by using an outside “expert”, the writer rarely discloses the expert’s bias, usually Democratic. Googling his name, I see that he was a U.S. attorney in 1998 which suggests to me that President Clinton appointed him, and he appointed a lot of them, having fired every single US Attorney when he took office, and 30 more subsequently during his eight year term in office.

And while the number he replaced was astounding, his immediate Democratic predecessor, Jimmy Carter, replaced at least one during the middle of his term of office.”

Read the rest.

Clarice notes as I have that Clinton fired (let term expire and flat out can) 30 more US attorneys between 1994 until the expiration of his term. Again, I am researching the names now and will post them when I have them.