If you haven’t figured it out yet, the cry-baby prosecutor scandal is really the Valerie (is this my best side?) Plame story all wrapped in one.
How? It’s all about getting Rove baby!
“The group meets in the Roosevelt Room and includes aides to the White House counsel, the chief of staff, the attorney general and Karl Rove, who also sometimes attends himself. Each of them signs off on every nomination.
Mr. Rove, a top adviser to the president, takes charge of the politics. As caretaker to the administration’s conservative allies, Mr. Rove relays their concerns, according to several participants in the Wednesday meetings. And especially for appointments of United States attorneys, he manages the horse trading.
“What Karl would say is, ‘Look, if this senator who has been working with the president on the following things really wants this person and we think they are acceptable, why don’t we give the senator what he wants?’ ” said one former administration official. “ ‘You know, we stiffed him on that bill back there.’ ”
Mr. Rove’s role has put him in the center of a Senate inquiry into the dismissal of eight United States attorneys. Democrats and a few Republicans have raised questions about whether the prosecutors were being replaced to impede or jump-start investigations for partisan goals.
Political advisers have had a hand in picking judges and prosecutors for decades, but Mr. Rove exercises unusually broad influence over political, policy and personnel decisions because of his closeness to the president, tenure in the administration and longstanding interest in turning the judiciary to the right.”
Sounds like a scene from the Democrat training video, “The West Wing”.
The real target of Leahy, Schumer and other Democrats (oh, and the two or three republicans that are really democrats) has everthing to do with getting Rove and nothing at all with the actual story of the US attorneys.
Point of fact they’ve wanted to get him from the get-go for no other reason than when he called their response to 9/11 “timid” and he didn’t apologize for it. They want him – as does the left – because he kicked their ass in three consecutive elections. They want to get Rove for no other reason than what they accuse the administration of, “political and partisan purposes”.
Talk about hypocrisy.
Whether Rove is mentioned or not mentioned in the email or had “extraordinary influence”, to this date there isn’t a shred of evidence of any wrong-doing in the US attorney case. There isn’t one shred of evidence that the prosecutors were let go for any other reason than because they failed to please the President of the United States, of which they serve at the pleaure of.
But you know it won’t matter because it’s all about Rove baby, and if not this it will be another story the Democrats (and those who act like them) will dredge up.
Can’t wait for them to blame Global Warming on him.
No Response
ordi
March 29th, 2007 at 4:39 am
1The dems just know it isn’t their fault or the American people rejecting them and their ideas that caused them to lose those elections. It was the “EVIL” Rove.
LOL
Cornhusker
March 29th, 2007 at 7:03 am
2What they REALLY should be talking about is this:
Is DiFi dirty? (see HotAir today)
The “Culture of Corruption” rears its ugly head again.
hastingspete
March 30th, 2007 at 2:27 pm
3Mmmm. Yeah. So the fact that:
- With the exception of the US.A who went after Cunningham were all from swing states;
- Rove’s chief of staff became US.A in Arkansas (fancy that);
- Rove and Miers are both pointed out as instrumental in the attorney purge;
What we have here is no reason whatsoever to think he is involved, no way no how, in this “phony scandal”.
Guess he’s not involved in the GSA scandal, which in many ways is just as bad, even though it is his staff and his powerpoint used there?
Why is is that a guy whose primary/only job is the winning electoral politics is on the public payroll, along with all his staff?
It’s not that Democrats are out to get Rove, it’s that trail after trail after repugnant trail lead back to the guy. It’s amazing, really.
But everyone in this Administration is beyond criticism because they never do anything wrong or incompetently.
hastingspete
March 30th, 2007 at 2:58 pm
4Macranger states that nothing wrong was done – and this is a line ou of a number of people. So let me ask you:
Why is Gonzales lying like a rug about his role?
Why, in fact, are so many stories crossed and messed up, and the denials thick in the air?
Why are almost all Republican senators clamming up and pulling away from Gonzales?
How is it that everyone is suddenly losing their memories here? You would think that Alzheimer’s was a communicable disease at Justice (or the whole Admin for that matter) these days.
If this is no big deal, why are people quitting over it?
If everyone was comfortable with the way the decision-making was done here (and neither Sampson nor Gonzales nor ANYONE has explained even remotely how the process worked), then why aren’t they describing it accurately?
It stinks. It stinks to high heaven. And it’s totally and absolutely par for the course. And you guys will defend it to your dying breath, which is sadder than anything else.
RSS feed for comments on this post · TrackBack URI
Leave a reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Get the Discover® More Card
Microsoft Office 2008 for Mac. Starting at just $149.95 with free shipping.
Categories
Tags
Blogroll
News
Archives
Macsmind Copyright 2008, Macsmind is a registered trademark of Macsmind Media - BloggingPro theme by: Design Disease