Comments on: Delightful “Omissions” about Sharon Eubanks

By: clarice

clarice — Thu, 22 Mar 2007 15:27:35 +0000

Thanks! I read that story today with disbelief but didn’t google her name.

By: habanero

habanero — Thu, 22 Mar 2007 14:30:04 +0000

I want to be the first one to thank Ms Eubanks for the service she has provided.

What a creative way to provide the entire world with Hillarys campaign strategy playbook.

By: darwin

darwin — Thu, 22 Mar 2007 13:57:50 +0000

CREW was also aware of the Foley emails well before Hasert and other republican leaders were. It’s obviously an orchestrated effort. Too bad we don’t have any real journalists out there to expose these witchhunts.

By: shm10

shm10 — Thu, 22 Mar 2007 13:33:45 +0000

http://www.tobacco.org/news/229797.html

Very interesting. If the DOJ was exerting so much pressure why in the linked article did they re-fund the case when they just could have eliminated it all together.

How ridiculous!

(Tried to check out a few other sites via search for this woman but many already are only showing an error code..big hmmmmmm.)