On 6 April 2000, Senator (never been to Walter Reed but if you give me a microphone I’ll fake it) Schumer wrote this letter to AG Janet Reno “urging her” to drop DOJ claims in the Oneida land owner lawsuit brough by the DOJ:
“SCHUMER CALLS ON ATTORNEY GENERAL RENO TO DROP ALL JUSTICE DEPARTMENT CLAIMS AGAINST ONEIDA LANDOWNERS SENATOR DEMANDS FAIRNESS FOR ONEIDA LANDOWNERS
In the wake of failed negotiations in the Oneida Indian Nation land claims, US Senator Charles E. Schumer today wrote to US Attorney General Janet Reno urging the U.S. Department of Justice to drop all claims against the Oneida landowners, including financial claims.
In his letter to Reno, Schumer asked her “to take the final, critical step of removing the landowners from all liability in this suit whatsoever. Innocent landowners should not be held financially or legally responsible in any final judgement.”
As long as the landowners remain a party in the lawsuit between the Justice Department and the State of New York, they could be held liable for monetary damages such as rental value for the length of possession and future lease payments. Schumer asked that the 20,000 landowners named in the Justice Department action on behalf of the Oneida Nation be dropped from the lawsuit and that damages be sought only from New York State.
On Monday, the Justice Department is expected to file a status report on the case with the Court In his letter, Schumer asked that it “include a withdrawal of all claims against the landowners and a clear statement that neither damages nor any other type of relief will be sought against them. There is absolutely no reason to keep these citizens living in fear,” Schumer wrote.
Last year, Schumer successfully persuaded the Justice Department to remove the “ejectment” claim it had placed against the landowners from its lawsuit.
Now this might have been a good thing for Chucky to do, although Schumer has never done anything for the “good of it”, but merely to get his mug on camera.¬† But it’s one of hundreds of examples of how he loves to “threaten” those charged with executing the legal process in America.¬†¬† But again, Schumer doesn’t do anything except for an underlying motivation.
Case in point on this story Clarice Feldman at American Thinker writes:
“Lost in the kerfuffle about the Gonzales firings of 8 US Attorneys is the fact that Chuck Schumer has a hidden agenda: acting not only as the Senator from New York but as well as the Attorney General of the U.S. He pushed for the appointment of a Special Counsel, wrote at least 2 letters to the Attorney General¬† resquesting updates on the investigation and demanding action on the CIA referral letter respecting the public identification of Plame,. He obtained from Deputy AG Comey the promise to appoint a special counsel and looked the other way when one was appointed outside the statutory and constitutional framework for such appointments. Both Comey and Fitzgerald were well-known to him at the time having worked in the Southern District of New York .
If he succeeds in forcing Gonzales to resign , Gonzales’ Deputy will undoubtedly take over. That deputy, McNulty, like Comey and Fitzgerald, also comes from the office of the US Attorney for the Southern District of New York and is close to Schumer and his former colleagues. “
It would seem that we need to see more of why Schumer has such a vested interest in this.
Microsoft Office 2008 for Mac. Starting at just $149.95 with free shipping.
Tags
2008 Election
Acorn
Add new tag
Bailout
Barack Obama
Bill Ayers
Blagojevich
Bush
Colin Powell
Conservatism
corrupt democrats
Corruption
democrats
Dick Cheney
economy
Election 2008
Election Fraud
Elections
Eric Holder
Financial Crisis
Gay Marriage
Global Warming Nonsense
GOP
Hillary Clinton
Iraq
Israel
Joe Biden
Joe the Plumber
John McCain
Macranger Show
media
media bias
Michelle Obama
News
Politics
Poll Juice
polls
Rahm Emanuel
Rev. Wright
Rick Warren
Rod Blagojevich
Sarah Palin
Tech News
Technology
terrorismRecent Comments
Archives
Categories
No Response
clarice
March 14th, 2007 at 3:53 pm
1For once I agree w/Andy McCarthy:
“It’s remarkable that this is what it comes down to after the disgraceful Sandy Berger sweetheart plea; the inexplicable lack of movement on the Jefferson investigation (the congressman is now on the Homeland Security Committee notwithstanding two people who’ve pled guilty to bribing him, the happenstance of his being on tape taking a $100K bribe ‚Äî $90K of which was seized from his refigerator ‚Äî and an agent who’s sworn under oath that he obstructed the search of his home); the about-face on Jose Padilla (now he’s an enemy combatant, now he’s a criminal defendant); the sudden shift of the NSA’s terrorist surveillance program to the FISA court (after a year of asserting that this vital program could not work under the FISA statute); the lack of movement on any of the wartime classified information leaks; the absence of meaningful immigration enforcement against employers and on the borders; etc.
All that, which just kills those of us who care about the Justice Department … and what ends up getting congress whipped up is nonsense ‚Äî the proper political use of a political power that the last Democratic president and Democratic Justice Department used systematically and remorselessly.
Gonzales rates being defended strictly because it would be an outrage if he lost his job over this manufactured scandal. But the president shouldn’t be shocked that there isn’t exactly a tidal wave rushing to the attorney general’s defense.”
manufactured scandal
RSS feed for comments on this post · TrackBack URI
Leave a reply