Recent information I’ve received leads me to believe that the reason Democrats want the head of Gonzales on a platter has nothing to do with the US attorney’s departures, but possibly because the results of several on-going investigations are about to have devastating implications for them.
Details are murky, and I’m not just throwing this out [...]

• 0 Comments

It’s utterly facinating to see all the hoopty-do about seven prosecutors fired, which is drop in a bucket compared to the “Great Purge of ‘93″. But this was more than just a election year purge, it was essential to the Clinton’s agenda.
Let’s go to the New York Times, March 24th, 1993:
“WASHINGTON, March [...]

• 0 Comments

Seems the left is over the edge of reason on their manufactured “scandal” of the fired US attorneys. To prove the point witness a lefty lawyer Jeralyn Merritt’s pretzel logic.
“The travesty of the current U.S. Attorney firing scandal is not that U.S. Attorneys are being replaced. That is expected after an election, such as [...]

• 0 Comments

Hmmmmmm….
Only one problem. There would be no exposure because NO ONE IS LISTENING.
By the way, is the offer because the Democrats turned you down?

• 0 Comments

From this 1998 Judge Robert Borke article:
“She (Reno) was not in charge from the beginning. Upon taking office, in an unexplained departure from the practice of recent Administrations, Miss Reno suddenly fired all 93 U.S. attorneys. She said the decision had been made in conjunction with the White House. Translation: The President ordered it. Just [...]

• 0 Comments

First to the microphone, Senator (never been to Walter Reed but if you hum a few bars I’ll fake it) Schumer is ranting about the firing of US prosecutors, and especially expressing shock about Republican Senators contacting prosecutors to inquire about prosecutions.
You mean like this Chucky?
January 22, 2004
The Honorable James Comey
United States Department of Justice
950 [...]

• 0 Comments

Looks like Al Gore’s 15 minutes are way up as the Ny Times tells him to “Chill“. Dan Riehl sums up the article nicely, here is the money quote:
“In talks, articles and blog entries that have appeared since his film and accompanying book came out last year, these scientists argue that some of [...]

• 0 Comments

What part of the headline do not the Ny Times and the Washington Post NOT understand?
First, the Ny Times:
“The White House was deeply involved in the decision late last year to dismiss federal prosecutors, including some who had been criticized by Republican lawmakers, administration officials said Monday.
Last October, President Bush spoke with Attorney General Alberto [...]

• 0 Comments