Good news for the Good Guys!

WASHINGTON РGuantanamo Bay detainees may not challenge their detention in U.S. courts, a federal appeals court said Tuesday in a ruling upholding a key provision of a law at the center of President Bush’s anti-terrorism plan.

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit ruled 2-1 that civilian courts no longer have the authority to consider whether the military is illegally holding foreigners.

Barring prisoners from the U.S. court system was a key provision in the Military Commissions Act, which Bush pushed through Congress last year to set up a system to prosecute terrorism suspects.”

Of course good news for the good guys means bad news for the Bad (and leaky) Guys:

“Attorneys for the detainees immediately said they would appeal the ruling to the Supreme Court, which last year struck down the Bush administration‚Äôs original plan for trying detainees before military commissions.

“We’re disappointed,” said Shayana Kadidal of the Center for Constitutional Rights. “The bottom line is that according to two of the federal judges, the president can do whatever he wants without any legal limitations as long as he does it offshore.”

On Tuesday, a spokeswoman for Democratic Sen. Patrick Leahy, chairman of the Judiciary Committee, said he would accelerate efforts to pass a revision to the law that would restore detainees‚Äô legal rights.”

Well you know Leahy, he’s all about giving it up to the other guy.

Still a significant win for the GWOT, and addtionally important this means that the Supremes are unlikely to overrule it.

“A spokesman for the Justice Department, which was expected to seek dismissal of hundreds of prisoner cases pending in federal court, praised the decision.

“The decision reaffirms the validity of the framework that Congress established in the MCA permitting Guantanamo detainees to challenge their detention” through military hearings coordinated by the Defense Department,” said spokesman Erik Ablin.

Under the commissions act, the government may indefinitely detain foreigners who have been designed as “enemy combatants” and authorizes the CIA to use aggressive but undefined interrogation tactics.

But most criticized by Democrats and civil libertarians was a provision that stripped U.S. courts of the authority to hear arguments from detainees who said they were being held illegally.

Attorneys argued that the prisoners aren’t covered by that provision and that the law is unconstitutional.

‚ÄúThe arguments are creative but not cogent. To accept them would be to defy the will of Congress,‚Äù Judge A. Raymond Randolph wrote.”

Good news indeed!