“A day after President Bush pleaded with Congress to give his Iraq policy one last chance, the Senate Foreign Relations Committee rebuffed him by approving a nonbinding resolution declaring his troop increase in Iraq to be against “the national interest.”
The committee voted 12 to 9 to send a resolution of disapproval of the president’s Iraq policy to the Senate floor next week, setting up what could be the most dramatic confrontation between Congress and the Bush administration since the war was launched four years ago. Many Republicans voiced anguish over the president’s policy, but only one, Sen. Chuck Hagel (Neb.), a co-sponsor, voted in support of the resolution.
While some lawmakers and antiwar activists have dismissed the resolution as largely meaningless, senior Republicans and White House officials have worked furiously to minimize Republican defections, worried that a large, bipartisan vote would have significant political and international repercussions.
“In an open democracy, we voice our agreements and disagreements in public, and we should not be reticent to do so. But official roll-call votes carry a unique message,” said Sen. Richard G. Lugar (Ind.), the Foreign Relations Committee’s senior Republican. A vote for the resolution “will confirm to our friends and allies that we are divided and in disarray,” he said.
I applaud Senator Lugar and he is right in so many ways. Others are also right because the resolution is useless as the President - not the Senate nor the Congress - have any say in the Command of the troops in the field.
Yet for Biden and Hagel this isn’t about anything except face time before the cameras and only because they have always opposed the war do they get it.
In the field on the front lines right now the troops are wondering, “What the hell?” The enemy we face think of us in disarray and that they caused it by their “success”. But of course the enemy we have truly faced - that has dwarfed to nothing the effect of the insurgency and Al Qaeda - are those such as Joe Biden, Chuck Hagel, Murtha and other pansy media whores who would sell their grandmothers if Tim Russert smiled at them and called them, “Good dog”.
Note that they offer no alternative to the current plan except to throw to waste the sacrifices of our men and women out window and choose to say - if only to blame the President - that Iraq is too touch, too far gone for the greatest country on earth to stabilize.
Indeed it might well have been except for those who at home had consistently hindered our efforts by undermining the people’s confidence both in the President and the United States of America by their constant fault finding.
I’m not talking about general disagreement between Democrats and Republicans or even those who find fault with the conduct of the war. What war has ever been flawless? Sure their have been mistakes, yet there have been fantastic successes and war is, as Georges Clemenceau said, “a series of catastrophes which result in victory.”
But the Bidens and the Hagels and the Murthas have gone far beyond just general criticism - far beyond it. They have in fact committed a form of treason by placing politics and their own selfish political ambitions before our own national security, they have placed personality before principle.
In some cases such as Senator Jay Rockefeller they have provided aid and comfort to our enemies, and in other cases they have outright leaked sensitive information if only for the reason of thwarting the President, again for purely political motives.
How long we will tolerate them - for every nation gets the leadership it deserves isn’t known. One thing for sure, if God forbid we suffer defeat in Iraq or another attack on our shores, the Bidens, Hagels, Murthas, of our Govenment will be held accountable.
No Response
pagar
January 25th, 2007 at 6:27 am
1” One thing for sure, if God forbid we suffer defeat in Iraq or another attack on our shores, the Bidens, Hagels, Murthas, of our Govenment will be held accountable.”
I hope so, but I hoped that John Kerry would be held accountable for the defeat of the US in Vietnam. Instead the Democrats nominated him to be their presidential candidate. Thank God, he lost that bid. Now after a visit to one of his heroes, in Syria, he announces he will not be a presidential candidate in 2008. Could it be that even the terrorists have decided he is not a winner?
gumshoe
January 25th, 2007 at 1:36 pm
2“Now after a visit to one of his heroes, in Syria, he announces he will not be a presidential candidate in 2008. Could it be that even the terrorists have decided he is not a winner?”
Jimmy Carter lost his second chance at the Oval office,but our enemies in the ME still consider him a “winner”…why not Kerry?,
or Rockefeller,for that matter?
after all they’ve got different standards.
RSS feed for comments on this post · TrackBack URI
Leave a reply
Get the Discover® More Card
Microsoft Office 2008 for Mac. Starting at just $149.95 with free shipping.
Tags
2008 Election Acorn Add new tag Bailout Barack Obama Bill Ayers Blagojevich Bush Colin Powell Conservatism corrupt democrats Corruption democrats Dick Cheney economy Election 2008 Election Fraud Elections Eric Holder Financial Crisis Gay Marriage Global Warming Nonsense GOP Hillary Clinton Iraq Israel Joe Biden Joe the Plumber John McCain Macranger Show media media bias Michelle Obama News Politics Poll Juice polls Rahm Emanuel Rev. Wright Rick Warren Rod Blagojevich Sarah Palin Tech News Technology terrorismRecent Comments
Archives
Categories
Blogroll