The Washington Post has an interview up today with President Bush where they hit him with the same old tired questions they’ve been hurling around for five years. However, here they absolutely jump the tracks with this bit of Cosmik Debri:

“Bush came to Washington six years ago promising to be “a uniter, not a divider.” But after initial bipartisan work to pass the No Child Left Behind education law, the president became a symbol for the partisanship that divides and paralyzes much of political Washington. Working with a Republican-run Congress that was able to marginalize Democratic opposition, Bush pushed through tax cuts and judicial nominees that in many cases engendered bitter opposition.”

Excuse me? Bitter opposition? So he caused that by pushing the his agenda wrought by (grab your reality Democrats) winning the elections of 2000 and 2004.

By all accounts he kept his promise, in fact almost to a fault. He hasn’t been the divider, that distinction belongs to Democrats alone. Whether visiting our enemies during war and letting them in on our plans (as Senator Rockefeller did), or leaking classified information to the MSM (as Senator Dick Durbin and Rockefeller did), or even conspiring to orchestrate a “CIA leak investigation”, (Note to Chuck Schumer) to fillibustering valid and qualified judicial nominees, (Land Shark Harry) to on and on and on, it’s been the democrats nitpicking all the way baby.

Just because one party is disgruntled and whiny doesn’t make the other party at fault It just make the former a disgruntled and whiny baby.