More pages…..
“Another Republican congressman knew of disgraced former representative Mark Foley’s inappropriate Internet exchanges as far back as 2000 and personally confronted Foley about his communications.
A spokeswoman for Rep. Jim Kolbe (R-Ariz.) confirmed yesterday that a former page showed the congressman Internet messages that had made the youth feel uncomfortable with the direction Foley (R-Fla.) was taking their e-mail relationship. Last week, when the Foley matter erupted, a Kolbe staff member suggested to the former page that he take the matter to the clerk of the House, Karen Haas, said Kolbe’s press secretary, Korenna Cline.
The revelation pushes back by at least five years the date when a member of Congress has acknowledged learning of Foley’s questionable behavior. A timeline issued by House Speaker J. Dennis Hastert (R-Ill.) suggested that the first lawmakers to know, Rep. John M. Shimkus (R-Ill.), the chairman of the House Page Board, and Rep. Rodney Alexander (R-La.), became aware of “over-friendly” e-mails only last fall. It also expands the universe of players in the drama beyond members, either in leadership or on the page board.”
Note it doesn’t say that Kolbe or one of his staff notified The Speaker’s Office or the Page Boards, but then it’s sketchy…
“A source with direct knowledge of Kolbe’s involvement said the messages shared with Kolbe were sexually explicit, and he read the contents to The Washington Post under condition that they are not reprinted. But Cline denied the source’s characterization, saying only that the messages had made the former page feel uncomfortable. Nevertheless, she said, “corrective action” was taken. Cline said she still has not yet determined whether that action went beyond Kolbe’s confrontation with Foley.”
“A source”…..let me guess, someone with the intitials J.A.? Or how about M.R.?
At this point we have yet another pointless report about an anonymous page who withheld their powder for six years until just before the November 2006 midterms.
I think that the Wapo knows this so the aforementioned is merely a prelude to this innuendo, which is what looks like to be the “hidden agenda” in the story:
“In interviews with The Post last week, multiple pages identified Kolbe as a close friend and personal confidante, who was one of the only members of Congress to take any interest in them. A former page himself, Kolbe offered to mentor pages and kept in touch with some of them after they left the program, according to the interviews.
Kolbe once invited four former pages to make use of his Washington home while he was out of town, according to an instant message between Foley and another former page, Jordan Edmund, in January 2002. The pages planned to attend a first-year reunion of their page class. But they never took Kolbe up on his offer because of a snow storm, according to one of the four pages.
Cline said one of the youths invited was a former page of Kolbe’s. Because the congressman frequently travels on weekends, either to his Arizona ranch or abroad, the house is often available to friends, constituents, staff and former staff members, such as a former page, she said.
Kolbe, the only openly gay Republican in Congress, is retiring at the end of the year.”
Again, with the “Gay = Child Molester” angle from the MSM!
We have to come to the end of this tripe before we find out that Jonathan Weisman point is that, “Hey there’s more gay child molesters in the GOP!” One wonders if Weisman’s “source” has tipped him about more outings to come.
No Response
clarice
October 9th, 2006 at 7:56 am
1I’ve written the WaPo about how misleading this article is and we are running a piece on it in the AT.
The headline and lead graph suggest Kolbe knew about the letter in 2000, but the story indicates he first learned about it a few weeks. That is to say the writer misleads the readers into thinking the email was learned of, not written , in 2000.
azdad
October 9th, 2006 at 8:48 am
2For what its worth, the local headline for this story (Arizona Republic) uses the headline: “Kolbe knew of e-mails by Foley in 2000″ and deletes the phrase “the only outwardly gay Republican in Congress”. Otherwise, word-for-word. It’s hard not to conclude that Kolbe knew in 2000 from this version also.
azdad
October 9th, 2006 at 8:50 am
3I did conclude from first reading that Kolbe confronted Foley in 2000. Now I’m totally confused.
clarice
October 9th, 2006 at 10:22 am
4http://americanthinker.com/comments.php?comments_id=6313
azdad
October 9th, 2006 at 11:50 am
5Geez, Clarice! I haven’t diagramed a sentence in 50 yrs. Do you think WAPO staff old enuff or smart enuff to do that? Of course their way does advance their evident agenda.
Then too, if they had not included the ‘outwardly gay’ phrase, people could have, like I did with the local version, think “Hey, a Republican congressman took him to task in 2000.” Including it, I guess, is another case of one gay covering for another??
Too cute for me.
RSS feed for comments on this post · TrackBack URI
Leave a reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Top Stories in the Blogosphere News
Microsoft Office 2008 for Mac. Starting at just $149.95 with free shipping.
The Commander in Chief at Work!
News
Reading List
Most Popular Posts
Macsmind – Politics, Culture and Breaking News and the 2012 Presidential Election! Copyright 2008, Macsmind is a registered trademark of Macsmind Media - BloggingPro theme by: Design Disease