The reason you are hearing from Richard Clarke through mostly Podesta’s “Think Progress” website, is that Clarke has much to answer for for 9/11, and much that may become clearer by it’s airing.
Among those I personally know who have given me the low down on Clarke over the last few years, there is also a more visible figure who knows about the wasted efforts to capture Osama Bin Laden, and he’s no fan of Clarke. From a Weekly Standard article in 2004, speaking of former Bin Laden unit commander Michael Scheuer who had these thoughts on Clarke:
“Scheuer thinks Clarke is a risk-averse poseur who didn’t do enough to fight bin Laden prior to September 11, 2001. At his breakfast with reporters, Scheuer said that on 10 separate occasions his unit, codename “Alec,” provided key policymakers with information that could’ve lead to the killing or capture of Osama bin Laden. “In each of those 10 instances,” Scheuer said, “the senior policymaker in charge, whether it was Sandy Berger, Richard Clarke, or George Tenet,” resisted taking action, afraid it would result in collateral damage or a backlash on the Arab street.
Which is precisely what the 9/11 Commission Report tells us. The Berger/Clarke/Albright sideshow was afraid to pull the trigger. Ops who were there – and yes they were on the ground in Afghanistan in spite of Clarke’s insistence they were not – and got their hands tied by “hand-wringing” by the Clinton Administration and especially the doofus duo of Albright and Berger, who didn’t make a move without getting “The Boss” to nod.
I’m going to have a lot more to say on this in th coming days, and like I said before there are those who were there and not drinking the Clinton Kool Aid. They too will be telling their story as well.
The fact that there is such a push back from former Clintonistas is proof in itself that this is a film to watch and take note of. Let’s not forget the real reason for all the venom. Democrats want power again, and given what we saw them do – or rather not do when it counted during the Clinton eight-year reign, we simply can’t afford it.
After this week, most of the Nation will know this as well.
democrats elections politics bush war on terror path to 9/11
No Response
Carol Johnson
September 6th, 2006 at 11:46 am
1OMG!! I just listened to the President’s speech on bringing 14 or so of the most dangerous and deadly terrorists out of the secret detention locations to Gitmo to face military commissions! The speech was absolutely breath-taking and garnered a standing ovation at one point at the White House.
Basically, Bush put it on Congress to get off their duffs and pass the legislation necessary for us to be able to prosecute these terrorists. They must now give up their idiotic dreams of getting Rummy fired and DO SOMETHING to help us WIN this WAR!!!
I must admit, I was extremely nervous and anxious when I heard about this speech…but it was absolutely music… to my ears anyway.
God Bless George W. Bush!
Sorry…got carried away.
Carol
owl
September 6th, 2006 at 2:53 pm
2Yeah Carol…..about time he asked every single one of them if they think they might find the time to help fight….that’s help fight the REAL enemy. Doncha know he gets sick and tired of always having to compromise with each person on the planet in order to prosecute killers? Go get em Mr President!
Now back on topic…I just watched Dem talking head Doug Stone on FOX and that was the most excited I have ever seen him. I mean almost shrieking…screaming like a stuck pig. They absolutely can not believe that something is getting past the DNC’s MSM blockage to the masses. He was saying the producer is Rush’s friend. Love it.
My big hope is that it will tell me what went down Sandy’s socks. I would have figured it was ‘life or death’ for someone that high up to risk being caught smuggling classified documents. Since the journos were not curious enough to ask him on the front pages, I am pinning my hopes on this movie.
Carol Johnson
September 6th, 2006 at 4:20 pm
3Sorry Owl,
But I heard this afternoon that ABC execs met over the holiday weekend to decide what needed to be cut or changed to “appease” the Dems! We are told that we “won’t be able to tell the difference” between the two versions, but what was the point of altering it anyway? Besides if we haven’t seen it yet, how do we know what’s been cut. There are still a few days before this is to air…more than enough time for someone to cave even further to pressure, I’m sure!
I put much more stock into Mac’s assertion that this is only the beginning of the story on Clinton’s utter uselessness as CinC. The truth will not be denied forever!
Carol
ordi
September 6th, 2006 at 10:22 pm
4I am Not sure yet what was cut but I heard the tailend of Hugh Hewitt’s show tonight and on tonights show he had on “The Path to 9/11″ writer/producer Cyrus Nowrasteh. There is a link to the audio to the show here:
http://hughhewitt.townhall.com/g/49cc08a8-c0ab-4578-821f-fef056029b8f
If I get a chance to listen to the whole thing and find out what was changed I will post a list here later.
ordi
September 6th, 2006 at 11:10 pm
5I was just listening to Hugh Hewitt’s show. He says this movie is going to be shown in Canada, New Zealand, Austraila, and on the British Broadcast system so this will be seen AROUND the WORLD! Me thinks they have a bigger problem then they know! LOL Sucks to have reality reach up and slap you across the face! The Dems should have faced up to the reality along time ago.
FYI: I do not have a problem with the showing what errors the Bush II, Bush I, Reagan Admins made. We need to learn from this. Wasn’t that one of the mantra’s of the Jersey Girls?
Tonight Hugh had on the “The Path to 9/11″ writer/producer Cyrus Nowrasteh. The audio to the program is here.
http://hughhewitt.townhall.com/g/49cc08a8-c0ab-4578-821f-fef056029b8f
The Strata-Sphere » Blog Archive » Clintons On Full Damage Control
September 7th, 2006 at 6:25 am
6[...] Update: Mac Ranger has contacts with people who were there, people who knew the players. Check his take out on this. [...]
Sister Toldjah » Scene from Path to 9-11 is not ‘fake but accurate’ as some suggest
September 7th, 2006 at 7:57 am
7[...] The same can’t be said regarding P2911 scene. MacRanger reminds us: Among those I personally know who have given me the low down on Clarke over the last few years, there is also a more visible figure who knows about the wasted efforts to capture Osama Bin Laden, and he‚Äôs no fan of Clarke. From a Weekly Standard article in 2004, speaking of former Bin Laden unit commander Michael Scheuer who had these thoughts on Clarke: [...]
Mark
September 7th, 2006 at 5:52 pm
8Nice post. What branch of government did you work in Mac?
Can you say?
Rich Poor
September 9th, 2006 at 2:52 pm
9Isn’t it great that we can depend upon Hollywood for a TRUE rendition of historical events? (Nevermind that a former FBI agent quit the production when he learned that the producers weren’t interested in historical accuracy.)
And what about our President bringing 14 prisoners to Guantanamo from the CIA’s foreign secret prisons? At last we’ll have some REAL evildoers at Guantanamo to join those currently housed there who have no connection to terrorism! Although the President’s plan for trying them precludes the prisoners (or their counsel) from reviewing the evidence against them, why should we be concerned about fair trials for people we already KNOW are guilty?
RSS feed for comments on this post · TrackBack URI
Leave a reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Top Stories in the Blogosphere News
The Commander in Chief at Work!
News
Reading List
Most Popular Posts
Macsmind – Politics, Culture and Breaking News! Copyright 2008, Macsmind is a registered trademark of Macsmind Media - BloggingPro theme by: Design Disease