As I said here, this “leak” of the NIE of April 2006 wasn’t anything more than a designed hit to stem the rise (didn’t work) of President Bush’s popularity, and have the maximum fire for effect during election season.
Clarice Feldman makes note of this in her article in American Thinker.
“As in the Plame case, selective leaks of the NIE appear long after the distribution of the document‚Äîin this case almost 6 months afterward‚Äîwith a clear intent of helping the Democrats in the upcoming election.”
We can pretty much ignore all this planned grandstanding by the Democrats including the “Irate Generals Parade” on Capital Hill today. Please. If General John R.S. Batiste had something to say and a pair to say it, and if it were even half assed correct, he should have had the balls to say it WHILE on active duty, not after he retired and secured his vittles.
Especially since just last year while in uniform he said during a official homecoming from Iraq during a ceremony May 16 at Harvey Barracks in Germany:
“Batiste reflected on what their year supporting Operation Iraqi Freedom has meant to the division.
“The Soldiers of this great division have once again carried on the legacy of the historic 1st Infantry Division,” Batiste said. “From intense combat operations… to stability and support operations, you did it all, and you did it in spades. Your focus on discipline and standards at every level was apparent. Big Red One Soldiers were renowned for their warfighting tenacity and, at the same time, just as proficient in the business of changing attitudes and giving the Iraqi people alternatives to the insurgency.”
Batiste also acknowledged the division’s partners during the deployment, the Iraqi people.
“Our successes over the past year were not achieved alone. They were achieved by establishing partnerships with the people of Iraq, most notably with the Iraqi security forces,” Batiste said. “Your mentorship, training, and equipping empowered Iraqi security forces, and it provided the foundation to help them defeat the insurgency and provide a safe and secure environment.
“Some of the most rewarding moments over the last year were defined by the courage and enthusiasm of the Iraqi people as they served their country.”
Batiste noted the advances and improvements in education, health, and public works that were accomplished due to the partnership between the 1st Infantry Division and Iraqis.
“You assisted Iraqi leaders in setting priorities for nearly 2,000 projects worth more than $1 billion, creating jobs for thousands of Iraqis,” Batiste said.
The greatest proof, the general said, was that thanks in large part to the division, Iraqis held successful national elections Jan. 30.
“The Iraqi people demonstrated that their future would not be held hostage,” Batiste said. “I will never forget the images of Iraqis celebrating and proudly displaying their ink-stained fingers.”
Batiste paid tribute to those who sacrificed their lives in the division’s quest to bring self-sufficiency and democracy to Iraq.
“The division’s amazing success in Iraq did not come without a cost,” Batiste said. “We will never forget the 193 1st Infantry Division and Task Force Danger Soldiers who gave their full measure during both OIF I and II. On behalf of all the Soldiers of the 1st Infantry Division and the people of our great nation, I want once more to acknowledge their service, sacrifice, and the example they set for all of us.”
My, my what a year and a boatload of bucks from Democratic 527’s will do for a ‘man’.
No Response
kathie
September 25th, 2006 at 5:56 pm
1You can count on the Dems to build up the NIE report. They leaked it, and are using it—-that’s what they do. But I am sick of the military types pretending that there is only one way to conduct this war to be successful and it is their way, so Rummy is just stupid. Any body knows that there are probably 10 ways to do a complicated job and they could turn out equally difficult. These guys are military and just so despicable. Think of how honourably so many are serving. These guys are such loosers. They don’t have to make the final choice or be responsible for the decision, they can just sit around and pretend that they are important. No wonder they are retired–they were finished years ago. Only a Clinton could have promoted them to such a rank.
QT Monster's Place
September 25th, 2006 at 7:24 pm
2NIE: Who to Believe, Who to Believe?…
The New York Times reported today reported, yet again, classified information. They published part of the National Intelligence Estimate, the part that they say says that the Iraq War has resulted in more terrorists, made terrorism worse. Do most Ameri…
owl
September 26th, 2006 at 6:27 am
3One of my favorite smack-downs over at http://www.powerlineblog.com/
They end it with a slam dunk….
The bureaucrat leakers are Democrats who wanted to advance their party’s interests, and the reporters at the New York Times and Washington Post were also Democrats, and were happy to oblige. The bottom line is that you just can’t get adequate information from these news sources. Their grotesque biases outweigh the resources that, in theory, they are able to devote to covering the news. They can’t even provide a balanced account of a single bureaucratic report, let alone of a war.
RSS feed for comments on this post · TrackBack URI
Leave a reply
Get the Discover® More Card
Microsoft Office 2008 for Mac. Starting at just $149.95 with free shipping.
Tags
2008 Election Acorn Add new tag Bailout Barack Obama Bill Ayers Blagojevich Bush Colin Powell Conservatism corrupt democrats Corruption democrats Dick Cheney economy Election 2008 Election Fraud Elections Eric Holder Financial Crisis Gay Marriage Global Warming Nonsense GOP Hillary Clinton Iraq Israel Joe Biden Joe the Plumber John McCain Macranger Show media media bias Michelle Obama News Politics Poll Juice polls Rahm Emanuel Rev. Wright Rick Warren Rod Blagojevich Sarah Palin Tech News Technology terrorismRecent Comments
Archives
Categories
Blogroll