<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SSCI &#8211; Phase II &#8211; Proving a point by a prearranged conclusion</title>
	<atom:link href="http://macsmind.com/wordpress/2006/09/09/ssci-phase-ii-proving-a-point-by-a-prearraigned-conclusion/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://macsmind.com/wordpress/2006/09/09/ssci-phase-ii-proving-a-point-by-a-prearraigned-conclusion/</link>
	<description>Conservative News, Commentary and Common Sense</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 03:41:26 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Never Yet Melted &#187; Liberal Majority on Senate Intel Committee Adopts Pouting Spook&#8217;s Press Releases</title>
		<link>http://macsmind.com/wordpress/2006/09/09/ssci-phase-ii-proving-a-point-by-a-prearraigned-conclusion/comment-page-1/#comment-395</link>
		<dc:creator>Never Yet Melted &#187; Liberal Majority on Senate Intel Committee Adopts Pouting Spook&#8217;s Press Releases</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Sep 2006 21:30:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.macsmind.com/wordpress/2006/09/09/ssci-phase-ii-proving-a-point-by-a-prearraigned-conclusion/#comment-395</guid>
		<description>[...] AJStrata notes that media establishment journalists can&#8217;t read.  Now I know why journalists get their stories so wrong so often - they lack basic reading comprehension skills. With all the hoopla about the Senate Intelligence report supposedly saying there were no ties between Saddam and Terrorists (despite Iraq documents which log the training of thousands of terrorists, and notes reqarding meetings with Al Qaeda) it might behoove people to read them for themselves. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] AJStrata notes that media establishment journalists can&#8217;t read.  Now I know why journalists get their stories so wrong so often &#8211; they lack basic reading comprehension skills. With all the hoopla about the Senate Intelligence report supposedly saying there were no ties between Saddam and Terrorists (despite Iraq documents which log the training of thousands of terrorists, and notes reqarding meetings with Al Qaeda) it might behoove people to read them for themselves. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dc</title>
		<link>http://macsmind.com/wordpress/2006/09/09/ssci-phase-ii-proving-a-point-by-a-prearraigned-conclusion/comment-page-1/#comment-394</link>
		<dc:creator>Dc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Sep 2006 17:55:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.macsmind.com/wordpress/2006/09/09/ssci-phase-ii-proving-a-point-by-a-prearraigned-conclusion/#comment-394</guid>
		<description>Hint:

Mac, you have to read the addendum by Kean, etc.  It says, that Rocky and friends pitched such a fit over what the facts showed, that they had to alter some of their findings/conclusions or the dems wouldn&#039;t play.

He admits they also had to do some of that in the first report just to get it done.  But, they say that these findings that the Dems wanted in some cases goes entirely against the findings of fact. And that while they disagreed with it entirely, they had to go along..as that was the nature of such a bi-partisan effort.

Rocky also attached a statement, frothing BDS that the report now shows that Bush lied, etc..etc.

At times they would have several pieces of direct evidence, documents and statements from multiple sources and suggest it doesn&#039;t prove anything...move along..nothing to see. Then at others, they would accept the solitary word of someone who had motive to lie, as definitive evidence (including taking Saddam himself at his word). You are right...it&#039;s ridiculous! Half the committee signed onto two different addendum letters to say just that!

I found reading the addendum and attached letters more telling that the rest of it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hint:</p>
<p>Mac, you have to read the addendum by Kean, etc.  It says, that Rocky and friends pitched such a fit over what the facts showed, that they had to alter some of their findings/conclusions or the dems wouldn&#8217;t play.</p>
<p>He admits they also had to do some of that in the first report just to get it done.  But, they say that these findings that the Dems wanted in some cases goes entirely against the findings of fact. And that while they disagreed with it entirely, they had to go along..as that was the nature of such a bi-partisan effort.</p>
<p>Rocky also attached a statement, frothing BDS that the report now shows that Bush lied, etc..etc.</p>
<p>At times they would have several pieces of direct evidence, documents and statements from multiple sources and suggest it doesn&#8217;t prove anything&#8230;move along..nothing to see. Then at others, they would accept the solitary word of someone who had motive to lie, as definitive evidence (including taking Saddam himself at his word). You are right&#8230;it&#8217;s ridiculous! Half the committee signed onto two different addendum letters to say just that!</p>
<p>I found reading the addendum and attached letters more telling that the rest of it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: azdad</title>
		<link>http://macsmind.com/wordpress/2006/09/09/ssci-phase-ii-proving-a-point-by-a-prearraigned-conclusion/comment-page-1/#comment-393</link>
		<dc:creator>azdad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Sep 2006 15:39:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.macsmind.com/wordpress/2006/09/09/ssci-phase-ii-proving-a-point-by-a-prearraigned-conclusion/#comment-393</guid>
		<description>The dependence on post-war interviews with Saddam&#039;s staff struck me.  All I could visualize was Bagdad Bob reporting that they were winning, while leading armor elements were entering the city!
It was enough to make me quit reading.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The dependence on post-war interviews with Saddam&#8217;s staff struck me.  All I could visualize was Bagdad Bob reporting that they were winning, while leading armor elements were entering the city!<br />
It was enough to make me quit reading.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
