Let’s go back to 2004 and a REAL fictional movie, Fahrenheit 9/11. That is fictional to everyone except Democrats in an election year. Back then Michael Barone wrote of prominent Democrats attending a viewing and even talking the movie up as if it were even loosely based on fact:

“Do the democrats really want to join forces with Michael Moore? It sure looks like it. Last week, Moore’s documentary film Fahrenheit 9/11 opened in Washington with an audience that included Democratic National Chairman Terry McAuliffe, Sens. Tom Daschle, Barbara Boxer, and Tom Harkin, Congressmen Henry Waxman, Charles Rangel, and Jim McDermott (who before the war said that he believed Saddam Hussein more than George W. Bush), and the 9/11 commission’s most partisan member, Richard Ben-Veniste. The film received a standing ovation. In Manhattan, Democratic National Committee Treasurer Maureen White hosted a showing of the film for local big contributors. Seldom have leaders of a political party promoted a commercial film so shamelessly.”

Fast forward to 2006 and some of the same Democrats that attended that show are now crying foul, fraud and even threatening FCC licenses over and The Path to 9/11. Again, the simple fact that you see such a push from Clintonistas, Albright and Berger, among others only lends credence to the movie, more than it detracts - they are scared to death, as is the rest of the Democrat Party. And for good reason. In spite of what you heard, the portrayals are more true than false.

Fact is that they are going to get a lot more nervous and crazy. That’s because others were there and know what happened behind the scenes and while some are still on duty and cannot speak, many others can. Two of which I know personally who can refute Clarke, Albright and Sandy right out of their socks (sorry Berger). Point of fact those two WERE interviewed for the movie, as they WERE on the ground in Afghanistan, and which incidently is why ABC is so bold to air pretty much what they had.

Think about it folks, ABC wouldn’t have spent $40 million dollars and two years of production if they hadn’t already vetted the facts they will portray. Regardless of the hysteria, they are on pretty good ground. In fact, the witnesses are all too willing to come forward if needed to give their accounts in person if needed.

Let’s remember that the 9/11 Commission report didn’t report all the facts and in some cases - like Able Danger - ignored facts. The writers and directors pulled a lot of storyline not from editorial license, but from eye witness accounts. THATS why you see such a push back. They know the real Clinton legacy is about to go in the crapper and while the Democratic Party has pretty much disavowed the Clinton’s, the fact is that they are the last Democrats that were in power during the terrorism filled 90s, and proved that they cannot be trusted with National Security.

So look for more craziness to come, but in the final analysis they are going to lose this battle and lose it big.

UPDATE: Looks like Bill is going to need a case of Pepto, email from overseas, guess what “bootleg” movie is showing up? Told you, can’t stop the flood. Look for the “Berger Cuts” to show up on You Tube any day now.

UPDATE: Allah with more on the hypocrisy.

UPDATE II: Capt Ed, on how the strong arm tactics of the Democrats will backfire.

UPDATE III: Director Blue Blog with “Moore” on the Democrat’s hypocrisy.